Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Just another example of SEC's inability (due to maintaining insufficient staffing{WS intent}) to enforce much at all. I suspect the note holder is somewhat known at WS and has the clout to ensure his/her presence is covered within the smoke of making $$ on the sly.
SHs obviously know by now that GTCH is highly shorted (naked, no less) but what is the need for MMs to put such a large wall at .0001? Constantly fighting back any buy surge is one thing but displaying a huge wall to begin with...serves what purpose? The O/S remains stable.
That AVAI PR was a mouthful. HUGE in the sense that what it says it CAN DO! I think GTCH may be finally getting some pps strength in having a significant number of AVAI shares...
Should see some AVAI revenue generation starting July.
I hardly ever spout facts - I do have strong opinions. While posters have the certain right to express doubt GTCH is the real thing (given the type of 10-Ks they issue, I WILL say I believe wholeheartedly that SHs will do right here. I am convinced that the patents they hold are golden. The fear is truly warranted given the tight hold WS has with their MMs. Naked shorting is far over the line from legitimacy.
Yet, SHAREHOLDERS OWN A PIECE OF THE ROCK. It is highly unlikely GTCH could fold and their golden patents sold off in a fire sale. If money is to be made, SHs share in the proceeds. IF the substance is real (Isay it is), these patents ARE GOLDEN and should provide a significant gain for retail holders.
In the end, we may get the short end of the stick, but our stick will be golden enough to far exceed anyone's holding of a personal pps of .003 or less. Chin up!!
It appears that there has recently been a much larger gap between naked short trade and real retail trade. That is, I am suggesting that there actually is a substantial amount of shares being bought up. How that could be without GTCH management issuing more new shares out of the A/S is not clear. I am suggesting that there might be some inside trade occurring pre-BIG PR??? Just stated so I can feel better...
You are definitely a greater person than I am! Believe it or not, given the length of your post, you accomplished a well-BRIEF summary of that obnoxious 10-K. I simply got sick when I attempted to do so. Much appreciated OB. Personally, I still think a buyout is a real possibility and another means of cleaning the slate of their toxic debt...rather than another patent sale... I favor a full-flush down the drain of ALL of their admin nightmare once and for all. Any company willing to do that has to have BIG balls! What a mess.
GTCH is certainly a drain on time and patience.
My problem is that SHs have NOTHING to determine REAL value. When that is the case, I tend to undervalue rather than the opposite. Existing contracts are 'contrived' based on untested/developed potential and on share value that has not been determined via true retail trade.
My rather dismal post primarily depended on the 10-k display - very convoluted, diluted and misinformative as to current SS and insider involvement.
My DD and consistent involvement in active posting and apprising other's posts keep me here willingly. I can taste the green lying about on all that GTCH touches - hints of gold seems to point to an enormous bloom.
I intend to be ready when the fruit ripens - and it WILL!
Given the 10-K, I think the 20% fee in securing a buyer is cheap IF they can get one. GTCH is a web of confusion...costly to clean. A buying company would have to absorb a hell of a high "nonreturnable" price to secure a sure picture of what they would actually get in the contract to buy once all the smoke and mirrors were cleared from GTCH's package. Given this 10-k and the history it depicts surrounding all the perceived value of GTCH/Tokenize patents, with the price they would pay to purchase - just exactly what would be the ROR/ROI?
I doubt the new 10-K helped to convince ANY buyer that they would want to take the chance...
10K quagmire. ONLY A BUYOUT can clean the slate. Nice to be on top of SEC reporting requirements...but I do not expect any movement as a result. The question remains per "WHO IS ON FIRST?" remains. The new 10K did not help matters.
Not really from a perspective of what the share price of Samsung shares trade at on the USA stock market... Try looking at the symbol SSNLF, which is supposed to be the Samsung symbol. Yield sign too!!! No trade info. EVERYTHING has to be so damn dark and secret these days. WTH!
MSG, I do not see the R/S recission as a concern. GTCH is done making those kind of management decision now. The R/S conversion NOW becomes WHAT IS THE CONVERSION RATE TO THE SHARES OF THE BUYER (LIKE SAMSUNG) WHEN THE BUYER SEALS THE BUY CONTRACT. Similar to an R/S from my perspective..
Do I understand correctly that the enormous naked short play 'against' GTCH can backfire if the MMs don't play it right if the news we are waiting for from GTCH happen to be SUPER! That is, if my own hunch is correct that MMs are purposedly keeping the GTCH PPS at .0001 is that shorts do NOT have to sell their borrowed shares, then when those short contract holders have to at a pps higher than .0001 (unlimited as to price they sell those shares at), that would ALSO require them to buy retail shares to pay back those shares they borrowed to close out their contracts. Of course, MMs supposedly, have their back and that when the shorts sell their shares, they expect the MMs to drop the retail share pricing BELOW what they sold them for (thus a gain!).
WHAT IF, MMs can't drop the pricing to ensure shorts gain...??? Shorts could lose big, right???
Can, MSG, again I try to only express positive thoughts. NEVER right but an opinion based on conviction. QUIET is the name right now. Might try viewing it from this perspective: If nothing was going on, PRs would be prevalent like the old bad days. So quiet for so darn long gives me rather a very positive perspective. BIG demands quiet.
My view. Only an MM shuffle to place wall.
I try to reflect a more positive perspective.
A very good chance here now that a "leak" will occur even if GTCH is trying to keep a lid on it.
99M...what a bunch of chit!
Werd, even if recorded, you think it will be meaningful? Enough to jumpstart the pps?
Can't speak for the rest of you but this thought keeps entering my mind. That recent USA arrangement with Samsung's "3D" program has breathed new life into my worn-out mind. Anyone perusing the web for any connectivity to GTCH is bound to find something worthwhile. I now see it no other way - GTCH is tightly wound around 3D chip technology.
How the connectivity emerges will be very tell-tale. I still expect to wait a long time to know the facts because of the necessity of legal 'dotting Is and crossing Ts. But is there something to behold? I think so. I will also add, with the Billion+ bundle offered to Samsung, their association with GTCH, if the truly is one, will cost them ... If it is GTCH's tech, expect them to pay a PREMIUM!
US has BILLIONS of dollars invested in the Samsung deal
GTCH has to be linked to this development somehow with all their 3D patents
Could they be 3D chips
Samsung building chips in USA
I really do need a break from GTCH. After just glancing at L2 and seeing the absurd wall being displayed there... DeJa'Vu all over again. I am convinced that UNTIL the GTCH/Tokenize sale is officially announced, my presence here is a waste of time. I also am inclined by logic and rationale that the complexity of the sale requires an enormous amount of CYA legalese. TIME.
I need to quit watching. See you all in a month. VERY BRIEF viewing is now the name of the game. Watching paint dry is not fun or a good use of my remaining time....
Can, I am hanging on to those thoughts as well.
Can someone simply please explain to me why there are these large purchases at the end of the day. The O/S remains fixed, no retail trader is selling YET 50M shares show up EOD.
GTCH. I am tired of good prospects and potential. SHs need factual results affecting the bottom line...
Great prospect! No $$ mentioned. No impact on pps - YET.
"no one wants to buy it ". Safe to say right now. Three years of drag pretty much explains it - with a few ups as well. Depressed pricing certainly provides incentive to buy if the retail trader has any speculative drive. Many do, thus the inflated O/S where, as the management released more A/S to O/S, they were gobbled up.
Yet those buyers, including myself, gave little attention to WHEN. The POTENTIAL remains, but for 3 years now, nothing substantive occurred to warrant an actual rise in the pps, in fact, the reverse occurred. Now most SHs own gobs of GTCH at pricing far less than what I paid to initially enter the game. For sure I bought more as the pps tumbled to lower my own personal GTCH pps. Still much higher than the current pps.
Even so, you are correct: I am done buying shares. Buying pretty much belongs to short newbies now. I can only wait. Boring as hell.
The REAL question remains though... Do I remain positive when thinking of potential? Of course!!! SHOW ME THE POTENTIAL!
86M traded...does not matter what you see the L2 close at. Trade demands accommodated with the never-ending supply of magic.
It appears that everyone has their full off the GTCH plate of 1s.
At least L2 is preparing for the run. No walls.
Don't forget, GTCH gets a big chunk of AVAI's success
I agree. It is only the time required to put it all together that I have such a hard time dealing with. Unfortunately, ALL my Pinky play money is in GTCH. Nothing else to get excited about. Why I may sound distraught is that my presence in Pinkyland DEPENDS on the final outcome of GTCH. Win or Lose????
I know, I am a dummy putting ALL my EGG in one basket....
GTCH is complicated. In math, complicated is champion of attention. In science, Nobel prizes are given for resolve. In business, money is to be made.
No doubt, waiting is taking its toll. My postings seem frivolous and repetitive. No more posts until I actually have something to talk about. GTCH is so silent.
Next Week??? For now, I remain convinced that MMs are issuing naked shares to any retail trader placing an order to buy at .0001. For the love of me, I cannot understand how or why the SEC allows this. Nurturing the retail trade is one thing (actively promoting trade - MM's function as I understand it), but to what extent can MM's ensure that each and every share they issue without a physical share (certificate) to back the count? It appears unlimited.
I do not see myself as being that foolish to believe that all shares can and will be accounted for in the 'end'. For example - those shares converted to an audited physical share count of a buyer's shares when GTCH shares undergo a conversion upon a buyout. Corrupt as hell as I see it. Don't think that retail trader's interests are fully accommodated. No doubt within my belief is that the retail trader suffers any "loss" as a result of this 'slippery finger count' due to the fact that the company buying GTCH "eats" any broker accounting of "actual" GTCH shares on account...backed by certificate or not. Magically, all false GTCH O/S shares that exist at that time, do, in fact, become certified with the buyer's shares, diluting real value at that point.
Where is the 'fair' in that?
12M shares at 500k each... Did reduce the ask... Should I be looking at this activity as an indicator?
IMO: NO!.. Epsilon is the heart, as I see it, to MANUFACTURING Chips - Wired would have the rights to using these NEW chip capability to do what they have in mind, but only a chip manufacturer would use the Epsilon patent to create the chip capability described.
For, Wired, what GTCH operational improvement patent (if one) would do the trick?