Fidelity SPDR Advertisement
Home > Boards > US OTC > Computers - Software >

Worlds Inc (WDDD)

WDDD RSS Feed
Add WDDD Price Alert      Hide Sticky   Hide Intro
Moderator: No Moderator rolvram, Lowhndcpr, iankelly
Search This Board:
Last Post: 10/18/2014 12:56:31 AM - Followers: 200 - Board type: Free - Posts Today: 0

Worlds Inc

History

Founded in 1994, Worlds Inc. invented and patented technology to solve problems associated with large-scale 3D multi-user environments, known as virtual worlds.

Worlds secured an early priority date by filing a provisional application with the USPTO in Nov, 1995. Within a year, Worlds filed a non-provisional patent application, claiming the priority date of their 1995 provisional application.

Worlds has pursued additional claims associated with their invention through a series of continuing patent applications, amassing a substantial patent portfolio:

Filing Date Patent Number Issue Date
Nov 13, 1995 app 60/020,296 provisional
Nov 12, 1996 6,219,045 Apr 17, 2001
Aug 3, 2000 7,181,690 Feb 20, 2007
Nov 2, 2006 7,493,558 Feb 17, 2009
Jan 13, 2009 7,945,856 May 17, 2011
Mar 19, 2009 8,082,501 Dec 20, 2011
Mar 19, 2009 8,145,998 Mar 27, 2012
Apr 8, 2011 8,161,385 Apr 17, 2012
Apr 11, 2011 8,407,592 Mar 26, 2013
Jun 16, 2011 8,640,028 Jan 28, 2014


Their patent portfolio remains in force until Nov, 2016 (20 years from the filing date of their first non-provisional patent application).

Worlds v. Activision

Complaint

On Mar 30, 2012, Worlds filed a patent infringement lawsuit against Activision. Worlds’ lawsuit seeks monetary damages as well as a permanent injunction barring the manufacture and sale of infringing devices. Additionally, the complaint accuses Activision of willfully infringing and seeks an award of exemplary damages, attorneys' fees, and related court costs.

Representation

Susman Godfrey is representing Worlds, without fee, unless the lawsuit is successful or is favorably settled out of court. Susman Godfrey is considered the top litigation boutique in the country. Max Tribble, lead counsel of Susman Godfrey, is the lead counsel for Worlds. Tribble has an extensive track record of patent infringement lawsuit wins and settlements for plaintiffs in lawsuits against large corporations, including:

  • Paltalk v. Microsoft

  • Mass Engineered Design v. Ergotron & Dell, et al

  • Sky Technologies v. Oracle

  • Sky Technologies v. IBM

For the latest information, see below...


  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 2M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 2Y
  • 3Y
  • 5Y
WDDD
Current Price
Volume:
Bid Ask Day's Range
Wiki
WDDD News: Amended Annual Report (10-k/a) 07/02/2014 03:27:25 PM
WDDD News: Worlds Inc. vs. Activision Blizzard, Inc. Patent Infringement Markman Hearing Set for October 06/30/2014 08:00:00 AM
WDDD News: Activision Publishing Lawsuit Against Worlds Inc., Worlds Online Dismissed With Prejudice 06/02/2014 07:30:00 AM
WDDD News: Quarterly Report (10-q) 05/15/2014 02:24:59 PM
PostSubject
#17669  Sticky Note Markman Hearing Went Well PatentPlays 10/05/14 04:56:01 PM
#17298  Sticky Note https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/15bENAu6Wg6ozd4CBfNYvfiQMjg6aaeJoWqI7vUjJ DataStream 09/08/14 07:06:23 AM
#17097  Sticky Note Markman Hearing :: 10/03/2014 iankelly 07/02/14 05:00:41 PM
#17808   What is best/worst case scenario regarding Hudson Bay? Gamerguy 10/18/14 12:56:31 AM
#17806   His name is John Herrel, a duplicitous manipulator. DataStream 10/17/14 08:27:55 AM
#17805   Last I checked The chickentrader was banned from iankelly 10/17/14 08:12:43 AM
#17804   "Where's the chickenhattrader now? zagdad 10/17/14 12:57:54 AM
#17803   How come the 8-K is not tagging to IPO$ 10/16/14 07:37:47 PM
#17802   I'm expecting that none of it will matter Captart7 10/16/14 02:18:07 PM
#17801   Agree,but when options are limited,funding is needed and DataStream 10/16/14 11:53:30 AM
#17800   I used Goldman as an axample of the Captart7 10/16/14 11:35:33 AM
#17799   Hudson Bay.... why now? Looking4BIGcash 10/16/14 11:27:33 AM
#17798   Agreed, But where would he get the money to iankelly 10/16/14 10:42:07 AM
#17797   From the Affidavit myunderstanding 10/16/14 10:41:45 AM
#17796   You seem to believe that Goldman was an DataStream 10/16/14 10:31:03 AM
#17795   Regardless, this is why firms like Goldman are Captart7 10/16/14 10:08:32 AM
#17794   I could be wrong but... iankelly 10/16/14 09:35:36 AM
#17793   Kidrin should have known if you're going to Captart7 10/16/14 09:26:38 AM
#17792   I got shafted in a lot of pennies WhiteOwl 10/16/14 12:29:34 AM
#17791   Yeah, it looks like Hudson Bay is a Go_War_Eagle 10/15/14 08:28:12 PM
#17790   Crooks. We are in the wrong business. They Lowhndcpr 10/15/14 05:23:20 PM
#17789   Excellent Post and a great read. Looking4BIGcash 10/15/14 04:35:56 PM
#17788   Go Kidrin! Way to lay it out... tradetrak 10/15/14 04:28:46 PM
#17787   Kidrin's Affidavit says it all DataStream 10/15/14 03:40:16 PM
#17786   Any thoughts on recent 8K retjarhead 10/15/14 03:26:47 PM
#17785   Amen. DataStream, thank you. It needed to be said. Looking4BIGcash 10/15/14 01:03:14 PM
#17784   HUDSON BAY = STAY AWAY rolvram 10/15/14 12:55:56 PM
#17783   In fact Hudson Bay settled with the SEC DataStream 10/15/14 12:50:42 PM
#17782   Doesn't Hudson Bay have a history of shorting art35 10/15/14 12:38:08 PM
#17781   If you took the time to understand what DataStream 10/15/14 11:52:41 AM
#17780   Patent, This is a second filing mentioning in the JC4033 10/14/14 11:57:43 PM
#17779   Hudson Bay End Run? PatentPlays 10/14/14 07:15:37 PM
#17778   Hudson Bay suing WDDD for $900K and 4.9M shares. flyersdh 10/14/14 04:36:14 PM
#17777   I don't believe that goes for the correction rolvram 10/14/14 03:13:47 PM
#17776   Decision as precedent on certificate of correction LouisDesyjr 10/14/14 03:07:20 PM
#17775   Someone had posted earlier that because Judge Casper myunderstanding 10/14/14 01:46:14 PM
#17774   Makes sense to me. Maybe now we WhiteOwl 10/14/14 12:42:11 PM
#17773   Im not an attorney but agree with you 100%. littleg 10/13/14 07:27:48 PM
#17772   Markman hearing transcript LouisDesyjr 10/13/14 04:27:59 PM
#17771   WDDD and certificate of correction LouisDesyjr 10/13/14 04:13:13 PM
#17770   Business method patents and WDDD LouisDesyjr 10/13/14 04:06:48 PM
#17769   http://www.vox.com/2014/10/11/6958701/the-patent-office-is-rejecting-a-lot-more- Looking4BIGcash 10/11/14 05:28:15 PM
#17768   I am all for analogies but yours is rolvram 10/11/14 08:25:42 AM
#17767   Nice analogy Ian. Very well done. WhiteOwl 10/10/14 02:50:04 PM
#17766   Thanks, Ian. brumvestor 10/10/14 02:06:34 PM
#17765   I'm sorry I was working within the analogy. iankelly 10/10/14 01:04:45 PM
#17764   the way I understood it was like this.. sboy777 10/10/14 12:50:14 PM
#17763   I thought the analogy was pretty good, except redrabbit 10/10/14 12:34:22 PM
#17762   Wow! I posted what I considered to be a brumvestor 10/10/14 12:12:35 PM
#17761   One thing you left out @Brumvestor iankelly 10/10/14 11:10:35 AM
#17760   The no fishing sign your analogy refers to DataStream 10/10/14 07:05:30 AM
#17759   Thanks PatentPlays, So Worlds will go to trial(or RetiredDr 10/09/14 09:21:30 PM
#17758   Scenario: You and 9 friends have fished a small, brumvestor 10/09/14 05:27:29 PM
PostSubject