SureTrader
Home > Boards > US OTC > Computers - Software >

Worlds Inc (WDDD)

WDDD RSS Feed
Add WDDD Price Alert      Hide Sticky   Hide Intro
Moderator: rolvram, notaclueyet, CDJ
Search This Board:
Last Post: 2/5/2016 11:52:31 AM - Followers: 222 - Board type: Free - Posts Today: 0

Worlds Inc

History

Founded in 1994, Worlds Inc. invented and patented technology to solve problems associated with large-scale 3D multi-user environments, known as virtual worlds.

Worlds secured an early priority date by filing a provisional application with the USPTO in Nov, 1995. Within a year, Worlds filed a non-provisional patent application, claiming the priority date of their 1995 provisional application.

Worlds has pursued additional claims associated with their invention through a series of continuing patent applications, amassing a substantial patent portfolio:

Filing Date Patent Number Issue Date
Nov 13, 1995 app 60/020,296 provisional
Nov 12, 1996 6,219,045 Apr 17, 2001
Aug 3, 2000 7,181,690 Feb 20, 2007
Nov 2, 2006 7,493,558 Feb 17, 2009
Jan 13, 2009 7,945,856 May 17, 2011
Mar 19, 2009 8,082,501 Dec 20, 2011
Mar 19, 2009 8,145,998 Mar 27, 2012
Apr 8, 2011 8,161,385 Apr 17, 2012
Apr 11, 2011 8,407,592 Mar 26, 2013
Jun 16, 2011 8,640,028 Jan 28, 2014


Their patent portfolio remains in force until Nov, 2016 (20 years from the filing date of their first non-provisional patent application).

Worlds v. Activision

Complaint

On Mar 30, 2012, Worlds filed a patent infringement lawsuit against Activision. Worlds’ lawsuit seeks monetary damages as well as a permanent injunction barring the manufacture and sale of infringing devices. Additionally, the complaint accuses Activision of willfully infringing and seeks an award of exemplary damages, attorneys' fees, and related court costs.

Representation

Susman Godfrey is representing Worlds, without fee, unless the lawsuit is successful or is favorably settled out of court. Susman Godfrey is considered the top litigation boutique in the country. Max Tribble, lead counsel of Susman Godfrey, is the lead counsel for Worlds. Tribble has an extensive track record of patent infringement lawsuit wins and settlements for plaintiffs in lawsuits against large corporations, including:

  • Paltalk v. Microsoft

  • Mass Engineered Design v. Ergotron & Dell, et al

  • Sky Technologies v. Oracle

  • Sky Technologies v. IBM

For the latest information, see below...


  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 2M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 2Y
  • 3Y
  • 5Y
WDDD
Current Price
Volume:
Bid Ask Day's Range
Wiki
PostSubject
#20684  Sticky Note OK, let's get this Cuozzo Speed (cs) conversation nicklaus1 01/26/16 10:34:01 AM
#18841  Sticky Note UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT Lowhndcpr 06/26/15 03:13:11 PM
#20704   Thanks Op1 - that was good for a tradetrak 02/05/16 11:52:31 AM
#20703   Thank you for the heads-up. Here's the news RockyW 02/03/16 10:51:31 PM
#20702   very nice! ShadowSpy69 02/03/16 10:03:21 PM
#20701   Everyone notice VHC ........yeah baby .... op1 02/03/16 08:55:07 PM
#20700   I had an order in at .0301 and WhiteOwl 02/03/16 08:36:47 PM
#20699   Anybody want to sell at .03, I have WhiteOwl 02/02/16 01:56:13 PM
#20698   Thanks Flyers! CDJ 01/28/16 08:16:17 PM
#20697   I am still buying at .03 and below WhiteOwl 01/28/16 02:11:53 PM
#20696   Indeed, but when patents are getting clipped at nicklaus1 01/27/16 11:59:42 PM
#20695   It is not uncommon to have loophole and abcd12 01/27/16 06:04:37 PM
#20694   That all makes sense to me. We nicklaus1 01/27/16 01:45:26 PM
#20693   The authority given to the PTAB as a abcd12 01/27/16 01:21:42 PM
#20692   From my review: flyersdh 01/27/16 09:00:02 AM
#20691   Flyers, then how many deal directly with issues CDJ 01/26/16 06:39:43 PM
#20690   Exactly, and I believe they are going to nicklaus1 01/26/16 05:26:45 PM
#20689   Scotus would not have taken the case if abcd12 01/26/16 04:46:49 PM
#20688   I am not sure about that, I think abcd12 01/26/16 04:08:22 PM
#20687   If you go back a ways on my nicklaus1 01/26/16 03:39:00 PM
#20686   "Six of wddd's IPR responses deal directly with flyersdh 01/26/16 03:11:07 PM
#20685   nicklaus1, well said, great post! CDJ 01/26/16 02:17:45 PM
#20684   OK, let's get this Cuozzo Speed (cs) conversation nicklaus1 01/26/16 10:34:01 AM
#20683   Any ideas on timeline here? Next year? shaky1 01/24/16 11:54:32 AM
#20682   Some very interesting legal cases that could have Rainmaker80 01/23/16 07:21:09 AM
#20680   Common sense tells me that they agreed to abcd12 01/22/16 05:15:11 PM
#20679   Yes, they did agree to be bound by CDJ 01/22/16 04:10:18 PM
#20678   lack of volume probably reflects that buyers are rolvram 01/22/16 12:48:35 PM
#20677   I am not sure about that, I think Rainmaker80 01/22/16 05:42:29 AM
#20676   Thanks Rain, I thought WDDD gave up their CDJ 01/21/16 08:10:15 PM
#20675   I wish I knew! I don't think anyone Rainmaker80 01/21/16 11:31:31 AM
#20674   I just read your post under patent law keith richards 01/20/16 10:56:21 PM
#20673   I've been around for yes just haven't posted nicklaus1 01/20/16 10:25:31 PM
#20672   Welcome..... notaclueyet 01/20/16 02:16:28 PM
#20671   Testing 1 2 3. First post ever, nicklaus1 01/20/16 02:02:46 PM
#20670   Hi Rain, once again great post. Do CDJ 01/19/16 02:02:04 PM
#20669   Great news, thanks so much for sharing! The CDJ 01/19/16 01:31:28 PM
#20668   My thoughts - I posted similar on the Rainmaker80 01/18/16 06:20:48 AM
#20667   Thank you DataStream for posting! RockyW 01/18/16 01:36:33 AM
#20666   Writ of Certiorari http://patentlyo.com/media/2015/10/Cuozzo-Speed-Technologies DataStream 01/17/16 04:03:05 PM
#20665   WOW this is huge thanks for the post. Rainmaker80 01/17/16 02:37:55 PM
#20664   SCOTUS to review IPR legality http://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-court-paten DataStream 01/17/16 09:00:28 AM
#20663   Well, let's hope so and that its positive. Rainmaker80 01/13/16 03:43:31 PM
#20662   I am by no means an expert, but keith richards 01/13/16 03:35:01 PM
#20661   Thanks Rain, I thought I may have missed something. CDJ 01/13/16 12:52:16 PM
#20660   I honestly have no idea if Caspar will Rainmaker80 01/11/16 12:53:56 PM
#20659   It's not difficult to confuse me regarding legal Jobur77 01/11/16 11:00:59 AM
#20658   I have no idea on that, but logic Rainmaker80 01/10/16 01:51:36 AM
#20657   Rain, do you know if Casper will rule CDJ 01/09/16 01:40:30 PM
#20656   Great to see WDDD holding the 3 cent Rainmaker80 01/09/16 01:41:18 AM
#20655   Rocky, thank you very much. CDJ 01/07/16 03:15:59 PM
#20652   Yep THREE CENTS SEEMS to be the support Rainmaker80 01/07/16 01:16:28 PM
PostSubject