SureTrader SureTrader SureTrader
Home > Boards > US OTC > Computers - Software >

Worlds Inc (WDDD)

Add WDDD Price Alert      Hide Sticky   Hide Intro
Moderator: quilt, jppatches
Search This Board:
Last Post: 1/23/2017 11:17:45 AM - Followers: 238 - Board type: Free - Posts Today: 0

Worlds Inc


Founded in 1994, Worlds Inc. invented and patented technology to solve problems associated with large-scale 3D multi-user environments, known as virtual worlds.

Worlds secured an early priority date by filing a provisional application with the USPTO in Nov, 1995. Within a year, Worlds filed a non-provisional patent application, claiming the priority date of their 1995 provisional application.

Worlds has pursued additional claims associated with their invention through a series of continuing patent applications, amassing a substantial patent portfolio:

Filing Date Patent Number Issue Date
Nov 13, 1995 app 60/020,296 provisional
Nov 12, 1996 6,219,045 Apr 17, 2001
Aug 3, 2000 7,181,690 Feb 20, 2007
Nov 2, 2006 7,493,558 Feb 17, 2009
Jan 13, 2009 7,945,856 May 17, 2011
Mar 19, 2009 8,082,501 Dec 20, 2011
Mar 19, 2009 8,145,998 Mar 27, 2012
Apr 8, 2011 8,161,385 Apr 17, 2012
Apr 11, 2011 8,407,592 Mar 26, 2013
Jun 16, 2011 8,640,028 Jan 28, 2014

Their patent portfolio remains in force until Nov, 2016 (20 years from the filing date of their first non-provisional patent application).

Worlds v. Activision


On Mar 30, 2012, Worlds filed a patent infringement lawsuit against Activision. Worlds’ lawsuit seeks monetary damages as well as a permanent injunction barring the manufacture and sale of infringing devices. Additionally, the complaint accuses Activision of willfully infringing and seeks an award of exemplary damages, attorneys' fees, and related court costs.


Susman Godfrey is representing Worlds, without fee, unless the lawsuit is successful or is favorably settled out of court. Susman Godfrey is considered the top litigation boutique in the country. Max Tribble, lead counsel of Susman Godfrey, is the lead counsel for Worlds. Tribble has an extensive track record of patent infringement lawsuit wins and settlements for plaintiffs in lawsuits against large corporations, including:

Paltalk v. Microsoft

Mass Engineered Design v. Ergotron & Dell, et al

Sky Technologies v. Oracle

Sky Technologies v. IBM

November 30, 2016

The Unites States Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) issued a ruling in Bungie, Inc (Developer Partner of Activision Blizzard) v. Worlds, Inc. validating certain key patent claims governing multiplayer interaction.

December 5th 2016:

Worlds (WDDD) as well owns 7.5% stake of Worlds Online, Inc. (WORX). as of 12/05/2016

December 6th 2016

Worlds Inc. (OTC QB:WDDD) is a leading intellectual property developer and licensee of patents related to 3D online virtual worlds. The Company has a portfolio of 9 US patents (6,219,045; 7,181,690; 7,493,558; 7,945,856; 8,082,501; 8,145,998; 8,161,385 8,407,592& 8,640,028) for multi-server technology in 3D applications, notably Virtual Worlds. The earliest of these patents issued on an application filed November 12, 1996. A provisional patent application, serial number 60/020,296, was filed on November 13, 1995.

These patents are related to each other and disclose and claim systems and methods for enabling users to interact in a virtual space. Worlds Inc. filed a patent infringement lawsuit against Activision Blizzard, Inc., Blizzard Entertainment, Inc. and Activision Publishing, Inc. in the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts on March 30, 2012.

Activision's World of Warcraft and Call of Duty video games have been identified in the complaint as infringing on Worlds' patents. Max L Tribble, lead counsel of Susman Godfrey L.L.P, will be lead counsel for Worlds in the suit.

The Markman hearing for the patent infringement suit by Worlds Inc. against Activision Blizzard, Inc., Blizzard Entertainment, Inc. and Activision Publishing, Inc. (Activision Blizzard et al) (Nasdaq: ATVI), was held October 3, 2014 to address various aspects of the infringement suit claims and how the words in the 11 disputed 'constructions' in the claims should be construed for jury consideration. On June 26, 2015 Judge Denise Casper of the United District Court for the District of Massachusetts ruled in favor of certain Worlds key definitions and interpretations governing the construction claims. Activision Blizzard the defendant in this action became “time-barred” to file an action to challenge the Patents using the only “other” venue that has the authority to disqualify the patents, The United States Patent Trial and Appeal Board.

December 6th 2016: 
Worlds current Federal Trial is on mutual consent hold pending the disposition of the validation or denial action of the PTAB. The Company's principle goal will be to continue to grow its IP portfolio, while protecting and monetizing it through patent infringement litigation. In addition, Worlds Inc. intends to be active in the creation and acquisition of related digital media technologies and patents that complement their current patent portfolio and that broaden the features, versatility and reach of the technology to allow for its utilization in the broadest possible way.

December 20th 2016

Worlds to Appeal to Federal Circuit on PTAB Rulings, Claims Marketwire   "Press Releases"
BOSTON, MA -- (Marketwired) -- 12/20/16 -- Worlds Inc. (OTCQB: WDDD) intends to file an appeal of recent Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) rulings to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit regarding Worlds' seminal technology that has been fundamental to the development of massively multiplayer online role-playing gaming (MMORPG) into a $20-billion dollar industry. Worlds' current investors plan to exercise their warrants to fund the appeals and ongoing business operations.

  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 2M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 2Y
  • 3Y
  • 5Y
Current Price
Bid Ask Day's Range
#24321  Sticky Note This is a good read for anybody who choo choo trader 12/22/16 10:44:58 PM
#24650   Agree on a rudimentary level. I think that jppatches 01/23/17 11:17:45 AM
#24649   See VHC. Won 3 jury verdicts against zombywolf 01/23/17 10:52:39 AM
#24648   As to "why" it's trading where it is, jppatches 01/23/17 02:25:24 AM
#24647   Agreed, that's what i was basing my numbers Bescaredxx 01/23/17 12:19:46 AM
#24646   Another good article that talks about a case jppatches 01/22/17 10:53:37 AM
#24645   I don't think anyone here could tell any jppatches 01/22/17 09:39:57 AM
#24644   Agreed.....The excitement and anticipation continues to build with tryz 01/22/17 09:25:12 AM
#24643   so does anyone have an estimate of what Bescaredxx 01/22/17 12:11:17 AM
#24642   Interesting graph. Not relevant to us but wonder tradetrak 01/21/17 10:53:30 PM
#24641   I don't think anyone could give you an jppatches 01/20/17 09:08:20 PM
#24640   Interesting and somewhat distressing to see the >20% tradetrak 01/20/17 08:53:59 PM
#24639   Thanks patches for the docket date. Onward and choo choo trader 01/20/17 12:14:15 AM
#24638   I've read anywhere from 8-11 months (from docketing). jppatches 01/19/17 11:12:47 PM
#24637   Yet another great post,jpp. Thanks. Any idea and/or tradetrak 01/19/17 10:43:44 PM
#24636   FYI - CAFC case has been docketed as jppatches 01/19/17 09:04:40 PM
#24635   Here's an amicus brief from that 101 ruling jppatches 01/19/17 03:21:19 PM
#24634   Time will tell as you say on the jppatches 01/18/17 11:14:23 PM
#24633   Great find. Thanks for sharing. Chalk up one tradetrak 01/18/17 10:30:47 PM
#24632   Hey jpp. I would respectfully diaagree with you tradetrak 01/18/17 10:28:30 PM
#24631   Solid due diligence jppatches....Data what are your thoughts tryz 01/18/17 05:23:24 PM
#24630   I will buy at .02, may be sometimes Luckyus 01/18/17 05:10:25 PM
#24629   Interesting ruling from CAFC today - patents NOT jppatches 01/18/17 02:52:25 PM
#24628   It's always fair to "wait and see" as jppatches 01/18/17 12:23:32 AM
#24627   LOL. Thumbs up to that. tradetrak 01/18/17 12:01:06 AM
#24626   Thanks, jpp and data for the articles. At tradetrak 01/17/17 11:54:00 PM
#24625   Dude, chill.....whew. lao5023 01/17/17 09:42:37 PM
#24624   Another great article! In fact Trump Jr had jppatches 01/17/17 07:27:25 PM
#24623  Restored possable apointee Long term 01/17/17 05:14:08 PM
#24621   Long term 01/17/17 05:09:38 PM
#24620   Is the tide already shifting? Not about WDDD jppatches 01/17/17 04:41:27 PM
#24619   What a crazy left wing idea. Since when Captart7 01/17/17 04:32:57 PM
#24618   Nice post, this allows me to rest easier, lao5023 01/17/17 02:39:36 PM
#24617   Agreed, I had high hopes, but, should have lao5023 01/17/17 02:34:36 PM
#24616   $10 trade moved the stock from 0.03 to jppatches 01/17/17 12:25:11 PM
#24615   Nice post, great article. Let's hope these nicklaus1 01/17/17 12:05:20 PM
#24614 DataStream 01/17/17 11:48:52 AM
#24613  Restored jpp,rain,dave, My math is correct, you didn't quilt 01/17/17 09:43:55 AM
#24612   Your post is either a liberal swipe at Captart7 01/17/17 09:33:24 AM
#24611  Restored Well the names that have been raised by jppatches 01/16/17 10:11:19 PM
#24610   It's absolutely beyond me, given his cabinet picks, tradetrak 01/16/17 09:25:05 PM
#24608   It was mentioned in their most recent PR jppatches 01/16/17 01:13:32 AM
#24607   Thank you. Where did you see max r/s? Imagineer66 01/16/17 01:09:08 AM
#24606   I don't have a view that would be jppatches 01/16/17 01:06:02 AM
#24605   What do you expect the R/S ratio to Imagineer66 01/16/17 12:40:49 AM
#24604   Again, a lot of basic finance errors you jppatches 01/15/17 06:04:29 PM
#24603   On your points jppatches 01/15/17 05:58:58 PM
#24600   JPP - i get all that you wrote, quilt 01/15/17 05:18:54 PM
#24599   A few comments on your post, which seems jppatches 01/15/17 02:16:21 PM
#24598   Problem i am starting to have is that quilt 01/15/17 01:05:11 PM
#24597   Here's a good article related to your comments jppatches 01/14/17 04:10:16 PM