Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
I have an old Quantaray 500mm Mirror lens, that I believe needs a T-Mount to attach to my Nikon D5200. The trouble is I can't find a T-Mount that slips over the mounting end of the lens, which is about 49mm across.
The lens looks just like this:
The adapter that I need doesn't screw on to the lens, it just slides on to the lens, and then three set screws hold it on to the adapter.
So, does anyone have any information on such an adapter?
I have 2 T-Mount adapters:
49mm for Minolta, it fits the Quantaray
52mm for a Celestron telescope adapter
TIA
You need to check out a mobile digital photo editor I am working on. I need some feedback and if you have an Android device here is the link.
Perspective
LOL, yeah, I do believe the resolutions will advance rather quickly, though.
Was just reading about it. I think I'll wait. 1.2 megapixel and Mac only.
Have you heard of Lytro cameras? You most likely will be hearing about and seeing this amazing camera that is reffered to as a "Light-field" camera that is designed to capture a large amount of light, and also collects data on the directions of light. This is important to this device....because it allows the post-picture processing to bring any part of a picture into focus after it has been taken.
Pentax K10D (10Mp) w/Tamron prime...AF/SP/Di 90mm 1:1 macro.
....I'd hoped to be able to get greater magnification by ring-coupling the 18-55 kit lens that came with the camera-body and this lens, but the company I'd ordered from sent a 52mm X 58mm female-to-male, instead of the 52mm male/58mm male reverse-coupler-ring they advertised. Just to warn, the company was dinodirect....I requested the RMA for returm, they authorised it....but they never followed up.
cool shot. what lens/camera are you using?
Interesting article about using a male-to-male lens coupler to mount a "kit lens" to a macro lens, boosting the magnification from 1:1 to 3:1.
Even if the primary-lens on the camera isn't a macro, magnification of greater than 1:1 could still be achieved.
http://photography-on-the.net/forum/showthread.php?t=807056
Nice blue-sky, star views at night must be awesome.
Bodie Ghost Town in Mono County, California
Visit Alternative Energy (AEGY), too:
http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/board.aspx?board_id=17584
A Meadow in Sequoia National Park
Have a picnic in the park with Mamas Homemade Penny Plays With A Side of Biscuits:
http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/board.aspx?board_id=22287
Results of sensor-cleaning on Pentax K10D, had several spots showing in "blue-sky" pics. Air-blower was failing to remove the spots. Dry-brush used to clean mirror first, and a second dry-brush was used on the CCD/sensor. (Using the same brush to clean sensor and mirror could cause oils/lubricants to be transfered from mirror-mechanism to the sensor.)
Sensor dirty from years of use,
First pass, very lightly..dry-brush, particles migrated to edge,
Second-pass, dry-brush...going to leave it be and take test pics later,
Picture link to some good photography taken in Wisconsin, some of mine there as well, mostly under "wildlife" catagory
www.capturewisconsin.com
To see mine, search allan king on the site.
Beautiful shot!
This site may be of interest to anyone who has ever had their camera stolen. . .
Camera Finder
Cheers, PW.
P.S. Not all cameras write their serial number into images' EXIF, so test the site to see if it works for yours.
Very nice. I can see that I need to get the camera out.
Great pictures. Why is the skunk blurry? LOL
Floating flashlight illusion,
Clone and "smudge" tools used. Smudge is helpful in evening-out circular-shapes left by clone tool and for color blending. The idea is to eliminate "patterns" that may draw the eye to an area that has been altered. The bamboo and tape used to support the flashlight has been removed, color texture and shadows cloned in its place.
You can use many programs to remove scratches from old photos, or remove artifacts from the photos altogether. Using adobe photoshop 2 (That is included on many computers for free) You can use the "clone-stamp" tool to take a micro sample of a portion of the picture...and "stamp" it over a flaw or object you want to remove.
First example has a hand in view, that must be removed..
Then the hand is concealed by copying micro-images of the rug nearby. (And some of the wood edges too.)
finally you may need to clip/clone little bits of things to make the edges look more natural. In the final view, areas of fur with tips visable were added to the edges of the ear/face area.
Digital-modification is an extention of control that the photographer/artist has over how the final product will appear.
I don't personally know anyone (alive) that still uses film, and develops their own prints. Many of the adjustments that now can be performed "in-camera" were only possible in the lab....and those decisions were made for you to conform to what the lab considered as acceptable adjustments.
I'd really like to see some digitally-modified pics from other members of the board. Don't be shy. Share some of your Favorite with us.
My Mother at her last visit to see my brothers home in Florida-morning, converted to oil and shading added in Adobe Photoshop.
I personally like to create individualised gifts on different types of paper and fabrics found in arts and craft outlets.
Having little sketching talent, (I can't sketch a realistict nose, for instance) I may take a photo copy, reduce contrast, increase exposure untill you can barely make out the profiles.
Next printing onto a textured sheet of appropriate size for the printer that you have. I've experimented with all kinds of printers, Canon, HP, Lexmark, Epson and Kodak. They all handle the papers with ease. White, off-white, cream and light-tan papers are going to give best results for color-prints. Light shades of other colors can give great surrealistic-effects for sepia/black and white photos.
Colored-pencil, ink and pastels, printed on textured paper.
Enhancements to photos that are "lackluster", Via digital modification, IMO, are OK if the aim is not to misrepresent what the original actually was. A sunset shot in Florida over-water turned out well enough to capture the memory, but as it was directly into the sun required manipulation of bright/contrasts to print more like I'd remembered it. For grins, I fiddled a bit with the color tempratures, hues and saturation. Then I printed a light image to a printer-compatable actual-canvas, and used water-color pencils and oil-pastels to emphasize the transitions between light and shadows.
I like the effect, others may not,
Here's a link to some really great aerial photo's.
http://justpaste.it/3ky
Followers
|
13
|
Posters
|
|
Posts (Today)
|
0
|
Posts (Total)
|
293
|
Created
|
06/05/04
|
Type
|
Premium
|
Moderator Chrisau | |||
Assistants HabaneroDog |
Volume | |
Day Range: | |
Bid Price | |
Ask Price | |
Last Trade Time: |