SureTrader
Nadex Advertisement
Interactive Brokers Advertisement
Home > Boards > US Listed > Telecommunications Hardware >

InterDigital Communications (IDCC)

IDCC RSS Feed
Add IDCC Price Alert      Hide Sticky   Hide Intro
Moderator: JimLur, dndodd, loophole73, pochemunyet, olddog967, Hydro_gen
Search This Board: 
Last Post: 7/27/2017 6:57:54 PM - Followers: 858 - Board type: Free - Posts Today: 88



http://www.interdigital.com

About Message Boards and the Moderators' Role

The principle objective of the iHub message boards is to maintain a high signal-to-noise ratio while encouraging the exchange of all points of view. Moderators are an important part of making our message boards beneficial to all participants and readers. Moderating a stock-specific board, particularly those which are controversial due to many divergent perspectives or newsworthy events, can be a challenging and time consuming role. The time and effort expended by our Members who volunteer their time to fulfill this valuable role is greatly appreciated and our Moderators should be treated with the respect they deserve for donating their time and efforts to the collective benefit of our community. Company-specific boards are the lifeblood of iHub. The Moderators' role is simple to define for company-specific boards: 
 

To promote the civil exchange of on-topic dialog that complies with the Investors Hub Terms of Service.
 

It is no accident that neither the above definition nor the  Terms of Service makes mention of investment sentiment, shareholder interests, or considerations such as "the good of the company." That is because the TOS are blind to investment sentiment. In order to be a successful Moderator and conduct a board within the scope of iHub's TOS, it is critical that Moderators distinguish their role and privileges as Moderator from their role and privileges as a posting Member. That is often easier said than done, particularly on active boards with both the typical and atypical controversy.

At the same time, Board Moderators are entitled and encouraged to express their investment sentiment in the same manner as any other Member; by participating in the dialog. However; insofar as their Moderator privileges are concerned, it is not the Moderators’ role to dictate bullish or bearish sentiment, to command the "tone" of the content be along any particular investment sentiment, or to favor one investment sentiment over another when removing or restoring messages.

It is also not the Moderators’ role to remove posts on the basis of "truth" or "accuracy". Readers determine the veracity of the posts they read and the credibility of other Posters. If a Moderator disagrees with another Member’s post they have the same recourse as any other User; to ignore the post, or to challenge it with a post of their own focusing on the information, not the other Poster.

In short, the role of the Moderator is to help foster an environment that promotes and encourages posting of ALL opinions and information about companies, regardless of the bullish or bearish sentiment of the posts, and to be the site’s first line of defense in ensuring we remain free of spam, vulgarity, and personal attacks.

 

Deletion of Posts

While in manage mode, Moderators will see a message that says "Click any message below to view, then remove or restore it." Clicking on a specific post will then show the option to "remove" in a box on the left. Clicking this will then provide the following options as a reason for removal: Personal Attack, Duplicate Post, Spam, Off Topic, Vulgarity, Author Asked to Remove, Violation of Privacy, Threat.

Duplicate

This is an accidental duplicate post by a single Member. This does not mean a similar message posted previously or the same content posted by a different Member.

Personal Attack

This is when someone attacks one or more members personally rather than the content of that Member's message. The post does not have to be addressed to the "target" of the attack to be considered a Personal Attack. If it attacks a messenger rather than the message, it qualifies for deletion and it is expected that Moderators will remove it.

Spam
Posting the same or similar content to more than two (2) boards within a calendar day;
Posting the same or almost identical post more than twice within a calendar day i.e. "where's the PR?", "anyone seen the PR?", "thought there was going to be a pr today?", "geez, is the pr coming out today or not?";
Sending the same or similar unsolicited PM to multiple recipients   

Off Topic
  • Posts about or focusing on other Members or groups of people and their reasons for posting on the board (i.e. "XYZDownDaDrain" is just a basher, ignore him", "XYZToDaMoon" is a pumper", "the naysayers are very loud today", "c'mon, where did all the cheerleaders go?"). The post does not have to be addressed to a specific person. If the post is about other Users then it should be removed.
    Posts with religious or political statements should be removed as "off topic". These inevitably create an avalanche of replies that are off topic as well.
    Posts about Moderators and/or deletions are also "off topic". Issues of this nature need to be discussed with a Site Admin.
    Putting "ot" at the beginning of a post does not make it acceptable. It is still off topic and eligible for removal.

Vulgarity
  • The PG13 rule is loosely used as a guideline to what is/isn't acceptable when determining whether a comment is vulgar. The theory is that if society has deemed it appropriate for a 13 year old to hear, it is unlikely that it will be offensive to the majority of Users.
    Otherwise, profanity (as explained above) is unacceptable on the stock boards, even when punctuation characters are used to "fill in the blanks" or letters are changed (f**k, azzh*le, etc.). Note that there are also "polite versions" for many acronyms and these are assumed to be the case when in doubt (i.e. "wtf?" = "what the freak?" in the polite version).
    Any form of vulgarity directed at another User is unacceptable and should be removed (i.e. "you're a sh*thead", "being an a** doesn't help your case").

Author Asked to Remove

Violation of Privacy
Posting of what the Member believes to be any personally identifiable information (email, real name, phone, address, etc.) about another User or posting the contents of a private message is a privacy violation. For example, if a Member posts that "XYZDownDaDrain is actually Bob Smith", whether the information is accurate is irrelevant. The Member was trying to disclose personal information. This is a serious violation and can get you suspended or terminated from the site.
Posting or referring to the contents of private messages without the author's prior consent is considered a violation of privacy and can get the User suspended or terminated from the site.

Threat
A Member threatening any other Member in any fashion is to be removed.
Threats or insinuations of violence or physical harm against anyone is a serious infraction and can get you suspended or terminated from the site.

If a post does not fit into any of these categories the post must not be removed.

Some posts fall into a "gray" area and are borderline depending upon the way they are read. As inclusion is favored over exclusion, please err or the side of not removing posts if they are not clear violations. Please use the "Report TOS Violation" button at the bottom of the post with your comments if the post is not egregious in nature and Site Admins will review the message.

Bottom line: Please use your best judgment in removing posts based on the above guidelines and let us know if you have any questions or need any help. And keep in mind that post removal and non-removal have to be given the same emphasis. It is not permissible, for example, to remove a post that calls someone a "pumper" while not also removing a post that calls someone a "basher". Investor sentiment, including your own, can NOT be part of the removal/non-removal decision.

Image:Ra1.gif More guidance about acceptable removal of posts can be found at FAQ:Deletions and Restores.

IDCC
Current Price
Volume:
Bid Ask Day's Range
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 2M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 2Y
  • 3Y
  • 5Y
IDCC News: Quarterly Report (10-q) 09:13 AM
IDCC News: Current Report Filing (8-k) 09:02 AM
IDCC News: InterDigital Announces Financial Results for Second Quarter 2017 08:30 AM
IDCC News: InterDigital Announces Date for Second Quarter 2017 Financial Results 07/11/2017 04:30:00 PM
IDCC News: Statement of Changes in Beneficial Ownership (4) 07/05/2017 04:30:08 PM
News News Alert: Quarterly Report (10-q) 07/27/2017 09:13:02 AM
PostSubject
#418430   or take this company private and give its mister 07/27/17 06:57:54 PM
#418429   Thanks Olddog... it just seems that IDCC has bulldzr 07/27/17 05:48:57 PM
#418428   20170727/IDCC/102792/55/179044/Q Daily SHO shows a good portion of today' jeffree 07/27/17 05:41:07 PM
#418427   bulldzr: The use of TV white space olddog967 07/27/17 05:10:46 PM
#418426   * * $IDCC Video Chart 07-27-17 * * ClayTrader 07/27/17 05:05:22 PM
#418425   Just for fun... jist1 07/27/17 04:33:48 PM
#418424   I do agree with you on this. felix7 07/27/17 04:26:33 PM
#418422   Just 1 new license with back money will mickeybritt 07/27/17 03:48:08 PM
#418421   We did not repurchase any shares of common jeffree 07/27/17 03:35:24 PM
#418420   One thing you or we have learned about mickeybritt 07/27/17 03:29:21 PM
#418419   This mgt team needs to either raise their dmiller 07/27/17 03:21:47 PM
#418418   Olddog and others... is it possible that IDCC bulldzr 07/27/17 03:09:28 PM
#418417   InterDigital's (IDCC) CEO William Merritt on Q2 2017 JimLur 07/27/17 03:02:45 PM
#418416   It was Frank Readick, Jr., but I think squingeqbob 07/27/17 02:54:35 PM
#418415   or best option ......... SOMEONE BUY THIS nokiashill 07/27/17 02:10:13 PM
#418414   how about a new ceo or a whole mister 07/27/17 02:07:41 PM
#418413   5G: The Next Tech Disruption In Media And Goodbuddy4863 07/27/17 02:05:14 PM
#418412   IMHO.... when the global assault on Qcom's is dsteeler 07/27/17 02:04:46 PM
#418411   Perhaps this has MUCH to do with what LutherTiggs 07/27/17 01:30:34 PM
#418410   And we beat estimates robustly! But as I've pochemunyet 07/27/17 01:10:53 PM
#418409   Boy, I would hate to see what would've minnowfish 07/27/17 01:08:00 PM
#418408   Has someone unleashed a mini crash on the market? squingeqbob 07/27/17 01:02:09 PM
#418407   In the PR giving Q2 guidance, IDCC said: redviking 07/27/17 12:37:40 PM
#418406   O'dog thank you. my3sons87 07/27/17 12:23:36 PM
#418405   Maybe investors want to see tangible real assets jist1 07/27/17 12:11:00 PM
#418404   my3sons: the reference to LG is in regard olddog967 07/27/17 11:49:56 AM
#418403   The latest happenings in the ZTE v IDCC my3sons87 07/27/17 11:45:20 AM
#418402   Umm...the co has over $20 a share in dmiller 07/27/17 11:38:06 AM
#418401   This sell off makes no sense to me!!!!!!! mickeybritt 07/27/17 11:22:01 AM
#418400   Unrecognized. dws 07/27/17 11:15:49 AM
#418399   Even with all the game playing with the JohnSamuel 07/27/17 11:15:00 AM
#418398   Wishful and speculative thinking on my part. squingeqbob 07/27/17 11:09:47 AM
#418397   Isn't it only fixed fee moneys?? jerry5 07/27/17 11:02:07 AM
#418396   O'dog in regards to the following from the my3sons87 07/27/17 11:00:22 AM
#418395   At least IDCC knows they only have a mickeybritt 07/27/17 10:54:36 AM
#418394   Just wondering out loud...did a leak of the la-idcc-fan 07/27/17 10:50:16 AM
#418393   What do you mean? LTE 07/27/17 10:42:27 AM
#418392   The estimates would not have been as high felix7 07/27/17 10:42:09 AM
#418391   sshhhh - don't tell him - msft was gejebr3 07/27/17 10:41:24 AM
#418390   Stop it...!!!...with the new CEO stuff... jeffree 07/27/17 10:39:17 AM
#418389   Ummmmm smauro 07/27/17 10:37:55 AM
#418388   re; dividend increase... jeffree 07/27/17 10:37:11 AM
#418387   Thank goodness for Microsoft money otherwise they would mister 07/27/17 10:36:25 AM
#418386   With the monies due hopefully the shareholders get patopinion 07/27/17 10:29:15 AM
#418385   With the monies that are due one would dws 07/27/17 10:24:39 AM
#418384   And that is just under existing locked in deals. felix7 07/27/17 10:21:08 AM
#418383   Amazon and FB sucking all the air out Limejuice22 07/27/17 10:19:24 AM
#418382   IDCC will collect 1b thru 2022..That is a orientbull 07/27/17 10:18:24 AM
#418381   another $$1billion$$ due over next 5 years under gejebr3 07/27/17 10:17:38 AM
#418380   In first half 2017 and first half 2016, mmbtx_1 07/27/17 10:16:57 AM
PostSubject