SureTrader
Interactive Brokers Advertisement
Home > Boards > US Listed > Telecommunications Hardware >

InterDigital Communications (IDCC)

IDCC RSS Feed
Add IDCC Price Alert      Hide Sticky   Hide Intro
Moderator: JimLur, dmiller, dndodd, pochemunyet, olddog967, Hydro_gen
Search This Board: 
Last Post: 11/20/2017 10:33:30 AM - Followers: 861 - Board type: Free - Posts Today: 2



http://www.interdigital.com

About Message Boards and the Moderators' Role

The principle objective of the iHub message boards is to maintain a high signal-to-noise ratio while encouraging the exchange of all points of view. Moderators are an important part of making our message boards beneficial to all participants and readers. Moderating a stock-specific board, particularly those which are controversial due to many divergent perspectives or newsworthy events, can be a challenging and time consuming role. The time and effort expended by our Members who volunteer their time to fulfill this valuable role is greatly appreciated and our Moderators should be treated with the respect they deserve for donating their time and efforts to the collective benefit of our community. Company-specific boards are the lifeblood of iHub. The Moderators' role is simple to define for company-specific boards: 
 

To promote the civil exchange of on-topic dialog that complies with the Investors Hub Terms of Service.
 

It is no accident that neither the above definition nor the  Terms of Service makes mention of investment sentiment, shareholder interests, or considerations such as "the good of the company." That is because the TOS are blind to investment sentiment. In order to be a successful Moderator and conduct a board within the scope of iHub's TOS, it is critical that Moderators distinguish their role and privileges as Moderator from their role and privileges as a posting Member. That is often easier said than done, particularly on active boards with both the typical and atypical controversy.

At the same time, Board Moderators are entitled and encouraged to express their investment sentiment in the same manner as any other Member; by participating in the dialog. However; insofar as their Moderator privileges are concerned, it is not the Moderators’ role to dictate bullish or bearish sentiment, to command the "tone" of the content be along any particular investment sentiment, or to favor one investment sentiment over another when removing or restoring messages.

It is also not the Moderators’ role to remove posts on the basis of "truth" or "accuracy". Readers determine the veracity of the posts they read and the credibility of other Posters. If a Moderator disagrees with another Member’s post they have the same recourse as any other User; to ignore the post, or to challenge it with a post of their own focusing on the information, not the other Poster.

In short, the role of the Moderator is to help foster an environment that promotes and encourages posting of ALL opinions and information about companies, regardless of the bullish or bearish sentiment of the posts, and to be the site’s first line of defense in ensuring we remain free of spam, vulgarity, and personal attacks.

 

Deletion of Posts

While in manage mode, Moderators will see a message that says "Click any message below to view, then remove or restore it." Clicking on a specific post will then show the option to "remove" in a box on the left. Clicking this will then provide the following options as a reason for removal: Personal Attack, Duplicate Post, Spam, Off Topic, Vulgarity, Author Asked to Remove, Violation of Privacy, Threat.

Duplicate

This is an accidental duplicate post by a single Member. This does not mean a similar message posted previously or the same content posted by a different Member.

Personal Attack

This is when someone attacks one or more members personally rather than the content of that Member's message. The post does not have to be addressed to the "target" of the attack to be considered a Personal Attack. If it attacks a messenger rather than the message, it qualifies for deletion and it is expected that Moderators will remove it.

Spam
Posting the same or similar content to more than two (2) boards within a calendar day;
Posting the same or almost identical post more than twice within a calendar day i.e. "where's the PR?", "anyone seen the PR?", "thought there was going to be a pr today?", "geez, is the pr coming out today or not?";
Sending the same or similar unsolicited PM to multiple recipients   

Off Topic
  • Posts about or focusing on other Members or groups of people and their reasons for posting on the board (i.e. "XYZDownDaDrain" is just a basher, ignore him", "XYZToDaMoon" is a pumper", "the naysayers are very loud today", "c'mon, where did all the cheerleaders go?"). The post does not have to be addressed to a specific person. If the post is about other Users then it should be removed.
    Posts with religious or political statements should be removed as "off topic". These inevitably create an avalanche of replies that are off topic as well.
    Posts about Moderators and/or deletions are also "off topic". Issues of this nature need to be discussed with a Site Admin.
    Putting "ot" at the beginning of a post does not make it acceptable. It is still off topic and eligible for removal.

Vulgarity
  • The PG13 rule is loosely used as a guideline to what is/isn't acceptable when determining whether a comment is vulgar. The theory is that if society has deemed it appropriate for a 13 year old to hear, it is unlikely that it will be offensive to the majority of Users.
    Otherwise, profanity (as explained above) is unacceptable on the stock boards, even when punctuation characters are used to "fill in the blanks" or letters are changed (f**k, azzh*le, etc.). Note that there are also "polite versions" for many acronyms and these are assumed to be the case when in doubt (i.e. "wtf?" = "what the freak?" in the polite version).
    Any form of vulgarity directed at another User is unacceptable and should be removed (i.e. "you're a sh*thead", "being an a** doesn't help your case").

Author Asked to Remove

Violation of Privacy
Posting of what the Member believes to be any personally identifiable information (email, real name, phone, address, etc.) about another User or posting the contents of a private message is a privacy violation. For example, if a Member posts that "XYZDownDaDrain is actually Bob Smith", whether the information is accurate is irrelevant. The Member was trying to disclose personal information. This is a serious violation and can get you suspended or terminated from the site.
Posting or referring to the contents of private messages without the author's prior consent is considered a violation of privacy and can get the User suspended or terminated from the site.

Threat
A Member threatening any other Member in any fashion is to be removed.
Threats or insinuations of violence or physical harm against anyone is a serious infraction and can get you suspended or terminated from the site.

If a post does not fit into any of these categories the post must not be removed.

Some posts fall into a "gray" area and are borderline depending upon the way they are read. As inclusion is favored over exclusion, please err or the side of not removing posts if they are not clear violations. Please use the "Report TOS Violation" button at the bottom of the post with your comments if the post is not egregious in nature and Site Admins will review the message.

Bottom line: Please use your best judgment in removing posts based on the above guidelines and let us know if you have any questions or need any help. And keep in mind that post removal and non-removal have to be given the same emphasis. It is not permissible, for example, to remove a post that calls someone a "pumper" while not also removing a post that calls someone a "basher". Investor sentiment, including your own, can NOT be part of the removal/non-removal decision.

Image:Ra1.gif More guidance about acceptable removal of posts can be found at FAQ:Deletions and Restores.

SureTrader
Interactive Brokers Advertisement
IDCC
Current Price
Volume:
Bid Ask Day's Range
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 2M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 2Y
  • 3Y
  • 5Y
IDCC News: InterDigital Wins IDTechEX Best IoT Technology Development Award for oneTRANSPORT Data Marketplace 11/16/2017 08:30:00 AM
IDCC News: InterDigital Issues Revenue Guidance for Fourth Quarter 2017 11/13/2017 04:30:00 PM
IDCC News: Successful Completion of InnovateUK Integrated Transport Project: 300+ Datasets, 11 Partners, and 9 Global Awards 11/06/2017 03:30:00 AM
IDCC News: Current Report Filing (8-k) 11/03/2017 04:08:59 PM
IDCC News: Quarterly Report (10-q) 10/26/2017 09:05:54 AM
PostSubject
#420080  Sticky Note Positive SeekingAlpha piece FWIW... LutherTiggs 11/14/17 04:46:32 PM
#419837  Sticky Note Please do not miss the importance of the loophole73 11/05/17 12:45:18 PM
#420131   Good to see big companies like CISCO get IDCCfan 11/20/17 10:33:30 AM
#420130   Interesting article, one of many, which you my3sons87 11/20/17 08:33:45 AM
#420129   Silence before the 'storm'! dws 11/19/17 02:05:39 PM
#420128   hello pierre3 11/19/17 11:11:51 AM
#420127   WOW ! I thought I recognized someone here: FISH21049 11/17/17 08:09:30 AM
#420126   Possible rationale for today's big move: la-idcc-fan 11/16/17 09:55:04 PM
#420125   Strong move with finally decent volume! jjff 11/16/17 07:33:11 PM
#420124   Mister, where did you find a copy of squingeqbob 11/16/17 06:08:45 PM
#420114   Agree. This is bigger for our so felix7 11/16/17 03:19:10 PM
#420113   1/2 OF TAX REFORM DONE! WE NEEDED THIS! jjff 11/16/17 02:05:16 PM
#420112   Today's theme song is brought to you by WayHaw 11/16/17 01:15:02 PM
#420111   By Chris Kelly, Total Telecom JimLur 11/16/17 12:12:18 PM
#420110   ddutta, Microsoft have developed their own proprietary platform for IDCCfan 11/16/17 11:54:14 AM
#420109   IDTechEX currently has a show going on: dilt1 11/16/17 10:59:16 AM
#420108   IMHO, a company like Microsoft will be able ddutta 11/16/17 10:11:43 AM
#420107   One transport and Chordant platform appear to be WayHaw 11/16/17 09:14:18 AM
#420106   InterDigital Wins IDTechEX Best IoT Technology Development Award Gamco 11/16/17 09:11:28 AM
#420105   LET'S MONETIZE SOMETHING! jjff 11/16/17 09:08:42 AM
#420104   InterDigital Wins IDTechEX Best IoT Technology Development Award nokiashill 11/16/17 08:58:57 AM
#420103   InterDigital, Inc. pochemunyet 11/16/17 08:42:38 AM
#420102   Meanwhile on the Reservation will patents become a patopinion 11/15/17 11:49:08 PM
#420101   Interesting change in ownership. Creative planning out of ddutta 11/15/17 09:53:50 PM
#420100   vegas, thanks. LTE 11/15/17 08:43:05 PM
#420099   IDCC After Hours Time (ET) Gamco 11/15/17 05:30:24 PM
#420098   Two very reputable institutions. lando1 11/15/17 03:39:33 PM
#420097   link http://www.nasdaq.com/symbol/idcc/institutional-holdings gejebr3 11/15/17 01:53:49 PM
#420096   looks like our 2 largest institutional holders added gejebr3 11/15/17 01:52:31 PM
#420095   The company said in the last conference call vegas options 11/15/17 01:13:44 PM
#420094   There are two types of iPhone X, and Gamco 11/15/17 11:43:39 AM
#420093   <<Why would he have a BUY rating on LTE 11/15/17 10:45:57 AM
#420092   We get any more good news articles we jjff 11/15/17 10:42:19 AM
#420091   maybe reflects accounting change impacts? gejebr3 11/15/17 10:41:22 AM
#420090   Perhaps B. Riley shares the view expressed in redviking 11/15/17 10:35:07 AM
#420089   Why would he have a BUY rating on loophole73 11/15/17 10:26:46 AM
#420088   Makes you wonder if that '2019' isn't a typo. redviking 11/15/17 10:19:23 AM
#420087   Any reason why they skipped 2018? squingeqbob 11/15/17 10:16:26 AM
#420086   InterDigital, Inc. (NASDAQ:IDCC) – Analysts at B. Riley redviking 11/15/17 10:06:16 AM
#420085   InterDigital: A Well-Established Company In A Promising Industry JimLur 11/15/17 06:35:05 AM
#420084   Well if this proceeds to the damages phase nokiashill 11/14/17 11:01:33 PM
#420083   Mister you sound as though you will be my3sons87 11/14/17 06:21:05 PM
#420082   IDCC's largest shareholder is Blackrock. I will speak vegas options 11/14/17 05:36:21 PM
#420081   of course they always forget to mention that mister 11/14/17 04:56:20 PM
#420080   Positive SeekingAlpha piece FWIW... LutherTiggs 11/14/17 04:46:32 PM
#420079   LOL, They must all have had puts on jjff 11/14/17 04:44:35 PM
#420078   The institutions must be run by morons. pierre3 11/14/17 04:40:55 PM
#420077   this stock is dead money and this management mister 11/14/17 04:35:56 PM
#420076   O'dog thx. my3sons87 11/14/17 03:53:01 PM
#420075   my3sons: The CAFC decision has not yet been olddog967 11/14/17 03:35:03 PM
#420074   Time spent litigating these now expired patents have dsteeler 11/14/17 02:19:14 PM
#420073   How do you know that the excess payments vegas options 11/14/17 02:11:34 PM
PostSubject