SureTrader Nadex Advertisement Interactive Brokers Advertisement SureTrader
Home > Boards > US Listed > Telecommunications Hardware >

InterDigital Communications (IDCC)

IDCC RSS Feed
Add IDCC Price Alert      Hide Sticky   Hide Intro
Moderator: JimLur, dndodd, loophole73, olddog967, Hydro_gen
Search This Board: 
Last Post: 5/26/2017 7:47:29 PM - Followers: 856 - Board type: Free - Posts Today: 0



http://www.interdigital.com

About Message Boards and the Moderators' Role

The principle objective of the iHub message boards is to maintain a high signal-to-noise ratio while encouraging the exchange of all points of view. Moderators are an important part of making our message boards beneficial to all participants and readers. Moderating a stock-specific board, particularly those which are controversial due to many divergent perspectives or newsworthy events, can be a challenging and time consuming role. The time and effort expended by our Members who volunteer their time to fulfill this valuable role is greatly appreciated and our Moderators should be treated with the respect they deserve for donating their time and efforts to the collective benefit of our community. Company-specific boards are the lifeblood of iHub. The Moderators' role is simple to define for company-specific boards: 
 

To promote the civil exchange of on-topic dialog that complies with the Investors Hub Terms of Service.
 

It is no accident that neither the above definition nor the  Terms of Service makes mention of investment sentiment, shareholder interests, or considerations such as "the good of the company." That is because the TOS are blind to investment sentiment. In order to be a successful Moderator and conduct a board within the scope of iHub's TOS, it is critical that Moderators distinguish their role and privileges as Moderator from their role and privileges as a posting Member. That is often easier said than done, particularly on active boards with both the typical and atypical controversy.

At the same time, Board Moderators are entitled and encouraged to express their investment sentiment in the same manner as any other Member; by participating in the dialog. However; insofar as their Moderator privileges are concerned, it is not the Moderators’ role to dictate bullish or bearish sentiment, to command the "tone" of the content be along any particular investment sentiment, or to favor one investment sentiment over another when removing or restoring messages.

It is also not the Moderators’ role to remove posts on the basis of "truth" or "accuracy". Readers determine the veracity of the posts they read and the credibility of other Posters. If a Moderator disagrees with another Member’s post they have the same recourse as any other User; to ignore the post, or to challenge it with a post of their own focusing on the information, not the other Poster.

In short, the role of the Moderator is to help foster an environment that promotes and encourages posting of ALL opinions and information about companies, regardless of the bullish or bearish sentiment of the posts, and to be the site’s first line of defense in ensuring we remain free of spam, vulgarity, and personal attacks.

 

Deletion of Posts

While in manage mode, Moderators will see a message that says "Click any message below to view, then remove or restore it." Clicking on a specific post will then show the option to "remove" in a box on the left. Clicking this will then provide the following options as a reason for removal: Personal Attack, Duplicate Post, Spam, Off Topic, Vulgarity, Author Asked to Remove, Violation of Privacy, Threat.

Duplicate

This is an accidental duplicate post by a single Member. This does not mean a similar message posted previously or the same content posted by a different Member.

Personal Attack

This is when someone attacks one or more members personally rather than the content of that Member's message. The post does not have to be addressed to the "target" of the attack to be considered a Personal Attack. If it attacks a messenger rather than the message, it qualifies for deletion and it is expected that Moderators will remove it.

Spam
Posting the same or similar content to more than two (2) boards within a calendar day;
Posting the same or almost identical post more than twice within a calendar day i.e. "where's the PR?", "anyone seen the PR?", "thought there was going to be a pr today?", "geez, is the pr coming out today or not?";
Sending the same or similar unsolicited PM to multiple recipients   

Off Topic
  • Posts about or focusing on other Members or groups of people and their reasons for posting on the board (i.e. "XYZDownDaDrain" is just a basher, ignore him", "XYZToDaMoon" is a pumper", "the naysayers are very loud today", "c'mon, where did all the cheerleaders go?"). The post does not have to be addressed to a specific person. If the post is about other Users then it should be removed.
    Posts with religious or political statements should be removed as "off topic". These inevitably create an avalanche of replies that are off topic as well.
    Posts about Moderators and/or deletions are also "off topic". Issues of this nature need to be discussed with a Site Admin.
    Putting "ot" at the beginning of a post does not make it acceptable. It is still off topic and eligible for removal.

Vulgarity
  • The PG13 rule is loosely used as a guideline to what is/isn't acceptable when determining whether a comment is vulgar. The theory is that if society has deemed it appropriate for a 13 year old to hear, it is unlikely that it will be offensive to the majority of Users.
    Otherwise, profanity (as explained above) is unacceptable on the stock boards, even when punctuation characters are used to "fill in the blanks" or letters are changed (f**k, azzh*le, etc.). Note that there are also "polite versions" for many acronyms and these are assumed to be the case when in doubt (i.e. "wtf?" = "what the freak?" in the polite version).
    Any form of vulgarity directed at another User is unacceptable and should be removed (i.e. "you're a sh*thead", "being an a** doesn't help your case").

Author Asked to Remove

Violation of Privacy
Posting of what the Member believes to be any personally identifiable information (email, real name, phone, address, etc.) about another User or posting the contents of a private message is a privacy violation. For example, if a Member posts that "XYZDownDaDrain is actually Bob Smith", whether the information is accurate is irrelevant. The Member was trying to disclose personal information. This is a serious violation and can get you suspended or terminated from the site.
Posting or referring to the contents of private messages without the author's prior consent is considered a violation of privacy and can get the User suspended or terminated from the site.

Threat
A Member threatening any other Member in any fashion is to be removed.
Threats or insinuations of violence or physical harm against anyone is a serious infraction and can get you suspended or terminated from the site.

If a post does not fit into any of these categories the post must not be removed.

Some posts fall into a "gray" area and are borderline depending upon the way they are read. As inclusion is favored over exclusion, please err or the side of not removing posts if they are not clear violations. Please use the "Report TOS Violation" button at the bottom of the post with your comments if the post is not egregious in nature and Site Admins will review the message.

Bottom line: Please use your best judgment in removing posts based on the above guidelines and let us know if you have any questions or need any help. And keep in mind that post removal and non-removal have to be given the same emphasis. It is not permissible, for example, to remove a post that calls someone a "pumper" while not also removing a post that calls someone a "basher". Investor sentiment, including your own, can NOT be part of the removal/non-removal decision.

Image:Ra1.gif More guidance about acceptable removal of posts can be found at FAQ:Deletions and Restores.

  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 2M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 2Y
  • 3Y
  • 5Y
IDCC
Current Price
Volume:
Bid Ask Day's Range
IDCC News: InterDigital to Present at 18th Annual B. Riley & Co. Institutional Investor Conference 05/17/2017 04:30:00 PM
IDCC News: Statement of Changes in Beneficial Ownership (4) 05/15/2017 05:21:56 PM
IDCC News: InterDigital Issues Revenue Guidance for Second Quarter 2017 05/11/2017 08:45:00 AM
IDCC News: Current Report Filing (8-k) 05/11/2017 08:30:46 AM
IDCC News: Statement of Changes in Beneficial Ownership (4) 05/09/2017 04:13:01 PM
PostSubject
#417459   Jim and OD, sorry, I also, did not magillagorilla 05/26/17 07:47:29 PM
#417458   olddog, Thanks. JimLur 05/26/17 05:29:34 PM
#417457   Jim: This is what IDCC's "Corporate olddog967 05/26/17 04:52:56 PM
#417456   Mickey, In the past I have been told JimLur 05/26/17 04:09:21 PM
#417455   od, Thanks as I didn't realize it was JimLur 05/26/17 04:00:04 PM
#417454   AT&T's LTE-M network travels through floors and walls, Gamco 05/26/17 03:50:42 PM
#417453   oops... Anyways I saw something on Bloomberg the other jeffree 05/26/17 03:48:38 PM
#417452   mister Trust me they read the board. More eyes mickeybritt 05/26/17 03:47:36 PM
#417451   Jim: That was old news. According to the olddog967 05/26/17 03:42:55 PM
#417450   Jeffree: Why post that article, the statistics olddog967 05/26/17 03:30:19 PM
#417449   mickey..why don't you send these messages to bill mister 05/26/17 02:01:31 PM
#417448   Magilla, Amazing. Almost a billion dollars in damages JimLur 05/26/17 01:30:24 PM
#417446   for idcc...A TERRIFIC OPPOrtunity...?!! jeffree 05/26/17 01:20:10 PM
#417445   Final BlackBerry, Qualcomm settlement reaches $940 million magillagorilla 05/26/17 01:15:40 PM
#417444   Mr. Merritt!! mickeybritt 05/26/17 11:03:47 AM
#417443   OD, as usual you have provided a succinct la-idcc-fan 05/26/17 10:37:56 AM
#417442   Thanks OD. la-idcc-fan 05/26/17 10:31:44 AM
#417441   "Let's get it on"...!!! jeffree 05/26/17 09:56:32 AM
#417440   Merritt sounded practically giddy about our 5G/IOT prospects... gejebr3 05/26/17 09:55:21 AM
#417439   Ouch! Latest Qualcomm sueball comes from ... its Gamco 05/26/17 09:54:15 AM
#417438   Hey Poch, When your in the confessional take hrbart 05/26/17 09:52:40 AM
#417437   Yep, when I make confession to my priest, pochemunyet 05/26/17 07:40:42 AM
#417436   Well Said, Best post of the Day !!!! hrbart 05/25/17 11:58:40 PM
#417435   My comments on today's cash flow discussion. olddog967 05/25/17 10:19:49 PM
#417434   Ia-idcc-fan: Analyzing cash flow is complicated. Besides stock olddog967 05/25/17 09:39:23 PM
#417433   Mickey, FISH21049 has given some great insight as to IDCCfan 05/25/17 08:58:13 PM
#417432   As a long time holder and reader of Serpson 05/25/17 08:53:56 PM
#417431   Yeah, thanks. I did forget about those. That la-idcc-fan 05/25/17 08:50:50 PM
#417430   la-idcc-fan: hare buybsacks for one. FISH21049 05/25/17 08:46:53 PM
#417429   This is a very interesting discussion. I think la-idcc-fan 05/25/17 08:40:33 PM
#417428   mickeybritt: go to this website FISH21049 05/25/17 07:49:09 PM
#417427   IDCCdan Please tell me what Avanci and their employees mickeybritt 05/25/17 07:00:06 PM
#417426   Yes, they can raise the dividend AND even FISH21049 05/25/17 04:57:51 PM
#417425   Mickey, Keep in mind the promise of 5G and IDCCfan 05/25/17 04:43:58 PM
#417424   gee thanks, professor...but jeffree 05/25/17 04:27:07 PM
#417423   jeffree & la-idcc-fan: here is some Accounting 101 information FISH21049 05/25/17 04:10:27 PM
#417422   If that is all there was to it, zdog 05/25/17 04:03:39 PM
#417421   "MY" raise would cost only about $24m more/yr...than jeffree 05/25/17 03:21:00 PM
#417420   Jeffree, as one layman to another: la-idcc-fan 05/25/17 02:48:57 PM
#417419   ok...I've had some basic accounting... jeffree 05/25/17 02:35:39 PM
#417418   I was holding off waiting for some accountant la-idcc-fan 05/25/17 02:01:22 PM
#417417   Qualcomm tells court that Apple is holding its Gamco 05/25/17 12:51:03 PM
#417416   anybody have feedback/comments on B Riley presentation... jeffree 05/25/17 12:10:15 PM
#417415   I'd put the dividend back into buying more pochemunyet 05/25/17 11:45:09 AM
#417414   jeffree You are so right on the $2.00 dividend mickeybritt 05/25/17 10:50:57 AM
#417413   hrbaart What difference does it make to you? mickeybritt 05/25/17 09:59:27 AM
#417412   $2/shr/yr...dividend... would use a bit over $60m cash/yr. according jeffree 05/25/17 09:57:50 AM
#417411   Is this the "Daily Morning Rant" ??? hrbart 05/25/17 09:54:38 AM
#417410   IDCC is a virtual gold mine or being mickeybritt 05/25/17 09:49:52 AM
#417409   LTE Just what is so important in 5G? If mickeybritt 05/25/17 09:15:26 AM
PostSubject