Switch to optionsXpress for advanced derivatives trading & earn 50 commission-free trades.
Advertisement
SureTrader Stock Hero Advertisement
Home > Boards > US Listed > Telecommunications Hardware >

InterDigital Communications (IDCC)

IDCC RSS Feed
Add IDCC Price Alert      Hide Sticky   Hide Intro
Moderator: No Moderator JimLur, Data_Rox, dmiller, magillagorilla, dndodd, olddog967
Search This Board:
Last Post: 3/31/2015 6:14:34 PM - Followers: 828 - Board type: Free - Posts Today: 22



http://www.interdigital.com

About Message Boards and the Moderators' Role

The principle objective of the iHub message boards is to maintain a high signal-to-noise ratio while encouraging the exchange of all points of view. Moderators are an important part of making our message boards beneficial to all participants and readers. Moderating a stock-specific board, particularly those which are controversial due to many divergent perspectives or newsworthy events, can be a challenging and time consuming role. The time and effort expended by our Members who volunteer their time to fulfill this valuable role is greatly appreciated and our Moderators should be treated with the respect they deserve for donating their time and efforts to the collective benefit of our community. Company-specific boards are the lifeblood of iHub. The Moderators' role is simple to define for company-specific boards: 
 

To promote the civil exchange of on-topic dialog that complies with the Investors Hub Terms of Service.
 

It is no accident that neither the above definition nor the  Terms of Service makes mention of investment sentiment, shareholder interests, or considerations such as "the good of the company." That is because the TOS are blind to investment sentiment. In order to be a successful Moderator and conduct a board within the scope of iHub's TOS, it is critical that Moderators distinguish their role and privileges as Moderator from their role and privileges as a posting Member. That is often easier said than done, particularly on active boards with both the typical and atypical controversy.

At the same time, Board Moderators are entitled and encouraged to express their investment sentiment in the same manner as any other Member; by participating in the dialog. However; insofar as their Moderator privileges are concerned, it is not the Moderators’ role to dictate bullish or bearish sentiment, to command the "tone" of the content be along any particular investment sentiment, or to favor one investment sentiment over another when removing or restoring messages.

It is also not the Moderators’ role to remove posts on the basis of "truth" or "accuracy". Readers determine the veracity of the posts they read and the credibility of other Posters. If a Moderator disagrees with another Member’s post they have the same recourse as any other User; to ignore the post, or to challenge it with a post of their own focusing on the information, not the other Poster.

In short, the role of the Moderator is to help foster an environment that promotes and encourages posting of ALL opinions and information about companies, regardless of the bullish or bearish sentiment of the posts, and to be the site’s first line of defense in ensuring we remain free of spam, vulgarity, and personal attacks.

 

Deletion of Posts

While in manage mode, Moderators will see a message that says "Click any message below to view, then remove or restore it." Clicking on a specific post will then show the option to "remove" in a box on the left. Clicking this will then provide the following options as a reason for removal: Personal Attack, Duplicate Post, Spam, Off Topic, Vulgarity, Author Asked to Remove, Violation of Privacy, Threat.

Duplicate

This is an accidental duplicate post by a single Member. This does not mean a similar message posted previously or the same content posted by a different Member.

Personal Attack

This is when someone attacks one or more members personally rather than the content of that Member's message. The post does not have to be addressed to the "target" of the attack to be considered a Personal Attack. If it attacks a messenger rather than the message, it qualifies for deletion and it is expected that Moderators will remove it.

Spam
Posting the same or similar content to more than two (2) boards within a calendar day;
Posting the same or almost identical post more than twice within a calendar day i.e. "where's the PR?", "anyone seen the PR?", "thought there was going to be a pr today?", "geez, is the pr coming out today or not?";
Sending the same or similar unsolicited PM to multiple recipients   

Off Topic
  • Posts about or focusing on other Members or groups of people and their reasons for posting on the board (i.e. "XYZDownDaDrain" is just a basher, ignore him", "XYZToDaMoon" is a pumper", "the naysayers are very loud today", "c'mon, where did all the cheerleaders go?"). The post does not have to be addressed to a specific person. If the post is about other Users then it should be removed.
    Posts with religious or political statements should be removed as "off topic". These inevitably create an avalanche of replies that are off topic as well.
    Posts about Moderators and/or deletions are also "off topic". Issues of this nature need to be discussed with a Site Admin.
    Putting "ot" at the beginning of a post does not make it acceptable. It is still off topic and eligible for removal.

Vulgarity
  • The PG13 rule is loosely used as a guideline to what is/isn't acceptable when determining whether a comment is vulgar. The theory is that if society has deemed it appropriate for a 13 year old to hear, it is unlikely that it will be offensive to the majority of Users.
    Otherwise, profanity (as explained above) is unacceptable on the stock boards, even when punctuation characters are used to "fill in the blanks" or letters are changed (f**k, azzh*le, etc.). Note that there are also "polite versions" for many acronyms and these are assumed to be the case when in doubt (i.e. "wtf?" = "what the freak?" in the polite version).
    Any form of vulgarity directed at another User is unacceptable and should be removed (i.e. "you're a sh*thead", "being an a** doesn't help your case").

Author Asked to Remove

Violation of Privacy
Posting of what the Member believes to be any personally identifiable information (email, real name, phone, address, etc.) about another User or posting the contents of a private message is a privacy violation. For example, if a Member posts that "XYZDownDaDrain is actually Bob Smith", whether the information is accurate is irrelevant. The Member was trying to disclose personal information. This is a serious violation and can get you suspended or terminated from the site.
Posting or referring to the contents of private messages without the author's prior consent is considered a violation of privacy and can get the User suspended or terminated from the site.

Threat
A Member threatening any other Member in any fashion is to be removed.
Threats or insinuations of violence or physical harm against anyone is a serious infraction and can get you suspended or terminated from the site.

If a post does not fit into any of these categories the post must not be removed.

Some posts fall into a "gray" area and are borderline depending upon the way they are read. As inclusion is favored over exclusion, please err or the side of not removing posts if they are not clear violations. Please use the "Report TOS Violation" button at the bottom of the post with your comments if the post is not egregious in nature and Site Admins will review the message.

Bottom line: Please use your best judgment in removing posts based on the above guidelines and let us know if you have any questions or need any help. And keep in mind that post removal and non-removal have to be given the same emphasis. It is not permissible, for example, to remove a post that calls someone a "pumper" while not also removing a post that calls someone a "basher". Investor sentiment, including your own, can NOT be part of the removal/non-removal decision.

Image:Ra1.gif More guidance about acceptable removal of posts can be found at FAQ:Deletions and Restores.

  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 2M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 2Y
  • 3Y
  • 5Y
IDCC
Current Price
Volume:
Bid Ask Day's Range
Wiki
Option Chain for IDCC
IDCC News: InterDigital to Sponsor IEEE ComSoc Small Cells Webinar 03/24/2015 02:00:00 PM
IDCC News: InterDigital Secures Milestone 5GPPP Project Win 03/24/2015 08:00:00 AM
IDCC News: InterDigital to Present at First Cambridge Wireless Technology Engineering Conference 03/23/2015 08:00:00 AM
IDCC News: Statement of Changes in Beneficial Ownership (4) 03/17/2015 05:10:18 PM
IDCC News: Statement of Changes in Beneficial Ownership (4) 03/17/2015 05:03:49 PM
PostSubject
#397709  Sticky Note Please post this to sticky notes... bulldzr 03/27/15 09:31:26 PM
#393361  Sticky Note Upcoming 'legal' events for Interdigital as I see FISH21049 12/08/14 10:26:16 AM
#392981  Sticky Note Let's make it simple: Fog1937 12/02/14 10:38:12 AM
#382423  Sticky Note Sticky info: Analyst Reports, Rmarchma Reference Information, etc. postyle 02/21/14 03:45:14 PM
#397759   Managing Large Scale Small Cell Deployments dndodd 03/31/15 06:14:34 PM
#397758   Expert opinion: we are opposed to the new dndodd 03/31/15 06:14:03 PM
#397757   Impressed with the multiple hits to the mid sab63090 03/31/15 04:33:28 PM
#397756   Jiff the USITC - Edis site is working fine. my3sons87 03/31/15 03:17:21 PM
#397755   USITC-EDIS HOME jjff 03/31/15 02:43:21 PM
#397754   Jiff where are you trying to access the my3sons87 03/31/15 02:01:27 PM
#397753   Trying to access the 337-613 remand getting APPLE jjff 03/31/15 01:35:03 PM
#397752   There has never been a truer statement regarding my3sons87 03/31/15 10:54:10 AM
#397751   Anti-troll patent reform opposed by some corporations; InterDigital Paullee 03/31/15 10:13:06 AM
#397750   Ericsson convinces US International Trade Commission to investigate Gamco 03/31/15 09:45:51 AM
#397749   United States Patent 8,995,365 Gamco 03/31/15 09:33:32 AM
#397748   United States Patent 8,995,370 Gamco 03/31/15 09:32:58 AM
#397747   United States Patent 8,995,376 Gamco 03/31/15 09:32:30 AM
#397746   United States Patent 8,995,422 Gamco 03/31/15 09:31:49 AM
#397745   United States Patent 8,995,554 Gamco 03/31/15 09:31:16 AM
#397744   United States Patent 8,995,921 Gamco 03/31/15 09:30:47 AM
#397743   United States Patent 8,995,991 Gamco 03/31/15 09:30:16 AM
#397742   United States Patent 8,996,015 Gamco 03/31/15 09:29:43 AM
#397741   United States Patent 8,996,078 Gamco 03/31/15 09:28:54 AM
#397740   Follow the money - dilt1 03/31/15 06:19:33 AM
#397739   I'd take one for the team and read Ghors 03/31/15 12:46:03 AM
#397738   OK Olddog... cool. But that never stopped bulldzr 03/31/15 12:25:17 AM
#397737   bulldzr: The filings that were referred to olddog967 03/30/15 09:50:13 PM
#397736   Paullee... the lack of an answer to your bulldzr 03/30/15 09:20:23 PM
#397735   More documents released on the remand. Seems they Paullee 03/30/15 08:11:36 PM
#397734   isn't it shareholders of record at the EOD JohnSamuel 03/30/15 06:04:44 PM
#397733   there are 8 more trading days... jeffree 03/30/15 05:38:16 PM
#397732   The MSFT/pNokio Delaware infringement trial is set to my3sons87 03/30/15 04:37:09 PM
#397731   ALJ Remand Initial Determination due 10 28 days. my3sons87 03/30/15 03:45:00 PM
#397730   Exactly those were my thoughts and why I dndodd 03/30/15 01:43:26 PM
#397729   dndood, Wistron is an IDCC handset licensee since my3sons87 03/30/15 01:07:35 PM
#397728   Apple rumored entry-level iPhone 6C to be made dndodd 03/30/15 12:47:12 PM
#397727   yup… Data_Rox 03/30/15 11:22:17 AM
#397726   I like IDCC right here (appx 51)....I think sab63090 03/30/15 11:18:26 AM
#397725   Added a few shares this am..can't resist at orientbull 03/30/15 10:40:53 AM
#397724   InterDigital to Sponsor IEEE ComSoc Small Cells Webinar bulldzr 03/29/15 09:26:09 PM
#397718   Somewhat of topic Sunday info, but interesting and bulldzr 03/29/15 04:22:35 PM
#397717   Apple Collected Over 18,000 Hours of Health and bulldzr 03/29/15 01:56:06 PM
#397716   Loop, I second tarheel's comment. I too lando1 03/28/15 09:54:33 PM
#397715   Were it not for your astute, well explained tarheelcpa 03/28/15 08:35:02 PM
#397714   short term the market is irrational, long term Limejuice22 03/28/15 11:08:31 AM
#397713   Ditto Loop. Thanks for all your expertise. MJPLIFE11 03/28/15 09:53:06 AM
#397712   TY Loop ! jjff 03/28/15 09:29:14 AM
#397711   Olddog, loophole73 03/28/15 09:19:17 AM
#397710   "Judge, We at Interdigital are not the Problem" eom. zombywolf 03/27/15 11:12:28 PM
#397709   Please post this to sticky notes... bulldzr 03/27/15 09:31:26 PM
#397708   Bull,you're 100% correct. Not a very wise decision MJPLIFE11 03/27/15 09:02:25 PM
#397707   Well, first of all, that website is not bulldzr 03/27/15 08:29:24 PM
#397706   Intel in Talks to Buy Altera magillagorilla 03/27/15 08:27:19 PM
#397705   A word of caution, I like the petition Turney 03/27/15 07:55:05 PM
PostSubject