SureTrader SureTrader SureTrader
Home > Boards > US Listed > Telecommunications Hardware >

InterDigital Communications (IDCC)

Add IDCC Price Alert      Hide Sticky   Hide Intro
Moderator: JimLur, Data_Rox, dndodd, FISH21049, olddog967, Hydro_gen
Search This Board:
Last Post: 1/21/2017 8:11:18 PM - Followers: 851 - Board type: Free - Posts Today: 0

About Message Boards and the Moderators' Role

The principle objective of the iHub message boards is to maintain a high signal-to-noise ratio while encouraging the exchange of all points of view. Moderators are an important part of making our message boards beneficial to all participants and readers. Moderating a stock-specific board, particularly those which are controversial due to many divergent perspectives or newsworthy events, can be a challenging and time consuming role. The time and effort expended by our Members who volunteer their time to fulfill this valuable role is greatly appreciated and our Moderators should be treated with the respect they deserve for donating their time and efforts to the collective benefit of our community. Company-specific boards are the lifeblood of iHub. The Moderators' role is simple to define for company-specific boards: 

To promote the civil exchange of on-topic dialog that complies with the Investors Hub Terms of Service.

It is no accident that neither the above definition nor the  Terms of Service makes mention of investment sentiment, shareholder interests, or considerations such as "the good of the company." That is because the TOS are blind to investment sentiment. In order to be a successful Moderator and conduct a board within the scope of iHub's TOS, it is critical that Moderators distinguish their role and privileges as Moderator from their role and privileges as a posting Member. That is often easier said than done, particularly on active boards with both the typical and atypical controversy.

At the same time, Board Moderators are entitled and encouraged to express their investment sentiment in the same manner as any other Member; by participating in the dialog. However; insofar as their Moderator privileges are concerned, it is not the Moderators’ role to dictate bullish or bearish sentiment, to command the "tone" of the content be along any particular investment sentiment, or to favor one investment sentiment over another when removing or restoring messages.

It is also not the Moderators’ role to remove posts on the basis of "truth" or "accuracy". Readers determine the veracity of the posts they read and the credibility of other Posters. If a Moderator disagrees with another Member’s post they have the same recourse as any other User; to ignore the post, or to challenge it with a post of their own focusing on the information, not the other Poster.

In short, the role of the Moderator is to help foster an environment that promotes and encourages posting of ALL opinions and information about companies, regardless of the bullish or bearish sentiment of the posts, and to be the site’s first line of defense in ensuring we remain free of spam, vulgarity, and personal attacks.


Deletion of Posts

While in manage mode, Moderators will see a message that says "Click any message below to view, then remove or restore it." Clicking on a specific post will then show the option to "remove" in a box on the left. Clicking this will then provide the following options as a reason for removal: Personal Attack, Duplicate Post, Spam, Off Topic, Vulgarity, Author Asked to Remove, Violation of Privacy, Threat.


This is an accidental duplicate post by a single Member. This does not mean a similar message posted previously or the same content posted by a different Member.

Personal Attack

This is when someone attacks one or more members personally rather than the content of that Member's message. The post does not have to be addressed to the "target" of the attack to be considered a Personal Attack. If it attacks a messenger rather than the message, it qualifies for deletion and it is expected that Moderators will remove it.

Posting the same or similar content to more than two (2) boards within a calendar day;
Posting the same or almost identical post more than twice within a calendar day i.e. "where's the PR?", "anyone seen the PR?", "thought there was going to be a pr today?", "geez, is the pr coming out today or not?";
Sending the same or similar unsolicited PM to multiple recipients   

Off Topic
  • Posts about or focusing on other Members or groups of people and their reasons for posting on the board (i.e. "XYZDownDaDrain" is just a basher, ignore him", "XYZToDaMoon" is a pumper", "the naysayers are very loud today", "c'mon, where did all the cheerleaders go?"). The post does not have to be addressed to a specific person. If the post is about other Users then it should be removed.
    Posts with religious or political statements should be removed as "off topic". These inevitably create an avalanche of replies that are off topic as well.
    Posts about Moderators and/or deletions are also "off topic". Issues of this nature need to be discussed with a Site Admin.
    Putting "ot" at the beginning of a post does not make it acceptable. It is still off topic and eligible for removal.

  • The PG13 rule is loosely used as a guideline to what is/isn't acceptable when determining whether a comment is vulgar. The theory is that if society has deemed it appropriate for a 13 year old to hear, it is unlikely that it will be offensive to the majority of Users.
    Otherwise, profanity (as explained above) is unacceptable on the stock boards, even when punctuation characters are used to "fill in the blanks" or letters are changed (f**k, azzh*le, etc.). Note that there are also "polite versions" for many acronyms and these are assumed to be the case when in doubt (i.e. "wtf?" = "what the freak?" in the polite version).
    Any form of vulgarity directed at another User is unacceptable and should be removed (i.e. "you're a sh*thead", "being an a** doesn't help your case").

Author Asked to Remove

Violation of Privacy
Posting of what the Member believes to be any personally identifiable information (email, real name, phone, address, etc.) about another User or posting the contents of a private message is a privacy violation. For example, if a Member posts that "XYZDownDaDrain is actually Bob Smith", whether the information is accurate is irrelevant. The Member was trying to disclose personal information. This is a serious violation and can get you suspended or terminated from the site.
Posting or referring to the contents of private messages without the author's prior consent is considered a violation of privacy and can get the User suspended or terminated from the site.

A Member threatening any other Member in any fashion is to be removed.
Threats or insinuations of violence or physical harm against anyone is a serious infraction and can get you suspended or terminated from the site.

If a post does not fit into any of these categories the post must not be removed.

Some posts fall into a "gray" area and are borderline depending upon the way they are read. As inclusion is favored over exclusion, please err or the side of not removing posts if they are not clear violations. Please use the "Report TOS Violation" button at the bottom of the post with your comments if the post is not egregious in nature and Site Admins will review the message.

Bottom line: Please use your best judgment in removing posts based on the above guidelines and let us know if you have any questions or need any help. And keep in mind that post removal and non-removal have to be given the same emphasis. It is not permissible, for example, to remove a post that calls someone a "pumper" while not also removing a post that calls someone a "basher". Investor sentiment, including your own, can NOT be part of the removal/non-removal decision.

Image:Ra1.gif More guidance about acceptable removal of posts can be found at FAQ:Deletions and Restores.

  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 2M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 2Y
  • 3Y
  • 5Y
Current Price
Bid Ask Day's Range
IDCC News: InterDigital Named a Clarivate Analytics 2016 Top Global Innovator 01/10/2017 10:00:00 AM
IDCC News: InterDigital Engineer Named IEEE Fellow 01/04/2017 11:53:26 AM
IDCC News: UK 5G Report Reveals “Significant Shortfall in Existing Infrastructure to Meet Future Aspirational Requirements” 12/20/2016 09:17:23 AM
IDCC News: InterDigital Announces Acquisition of Sensor Processing Technology Pioneer Hillcrest Labs 12/20/2016 09:15:00 AM
IDCC News: InterDigital Board of Directors Declares Regular Quarterly Cash Dividend 12/08/2016 04:30:00 PM
#382423  Sticky Note Sticky info: Analyst Reports, Rmarchma Reference Information, etc. postyle 02/21/14 03:45:14 PM
#414705  Restored Actually, IBD said "modem maker" and they have bulldzr 01/21/17 07:58:35 PM
#414704  Restored Nobody said they were bad - it is Hydro_gen 01/21/17 07:21:52 PM
#414702   dndodd,The wireless modem maker comments negates all other JimLur 01/21/17 06:11:51 PM
#414701   If that is the case I don't think dndodd 01/21/17 05:32:58 PM
#414700   True, but I am sure there was some bulldzr 01/21/17 05:04:53 PM
#414699   Actually its more like the investment community are Abig 01/21/17 04:54:39 PM
#414698   Abig, thanks for sharing those. On this bulldzr 01/21/17 04:50:30 PM
#414697   Another appearance in the IBD Abig 01/21/17 09:52:00 AM
#414696   From the IBD Abig 01/21/17 09:48:26 AM
#414695   It is a new day in America and mickeybritt 01/21/17 07:21:53 AM
#414694   Kinda ironic on Inaugaration Day that the big trickledown 01/20/17 10:34:26 PM
#414693   RE: QCOM.......It is unfortunate that Mchere is dsteeler 01/20/17 06:38:44 PM
#414692   It seems that QCOM is not the 800 my3sons87 01/20/17 04:40:33 PM
#414691   Apple...just BUY InterDigital... jeffree 01/20/17 04:22:02 PM
#414690   Apple Sues Qualcomm Over Licensing Practices Paullee 01/20/17 04:13:29 PM
#414689   Apple suing Qualcomm - it's good that IDCC LTE 01/20/17 04:13:11 PM
#414688   We shall, indeed. Good weekend, everyone! pochemunyet 01/20/17 03:17:57 PM
#414687   Poche we shall see if things get better my3sons87 01/20/17 03:16:30 PM
#414685   Americans for yet another peaceful transfer of power. pochemunyet 01/20/17 02:57:16 PM
#414684   JIFF, WHAT NEW DAY HAS DAWNED? my3sons87 01/20/17 02:52:33 PM
#414682   A NEW DAY HAS DAWNED!!!!!!!!!!!! jjff 01/20/17 02:49:29 PM
#414681   Poche what are you saying congratulations for and my3sons87 01/20/17 02:15:06 PM
#414680   Congratulations all Americans! pochemunyet 01/20/17 01:48:45 PM
#414679   Get the stock over $92.50 today and 50,000 mickeybritt 01/20/17 11:25:42 AM
#414678   Today is option expiration day and not many mickeybritt 01/20/17 10:11:05 AM
#414677   Next week is when the dividend is paid mickeybritt 01/20/17 09:44:55 AM
#414676   Amen! pochemunyet 01/20/17 09:30:43 AM
#414675   It is going to be a beautiful day mickeybritt 01/20/17 06:08:06 AM
#414674   I would think with the license of Apple dndodd 01/20/17 05:57:41 AM
#414673   Pochemunyet, Looking into my crystal ball...... I also see eagle-i13 01/19/17 05:30:51 PM
#414672   I feel confident that with all the positive pochemunyet 01/19/17 02:56:12 PM
#414671   Sons, I too wish something would happen. bulldzr 01/19/17 02:46:33 PM
#414670   Hopefully tomorrow or next week we see markets soar!!!!!! mickeybritt 01/19/17 12:41:59 PM
#414669   It is so quiet that IDCC should let my3sons87 01/19/17 12:32:18 PM
#414668   << The FTC has jurisdiction over any person LTE 01/19/17 11:17:14 AM
#414667   loophole73, the vote to pursue the FTC case LTE 01/19/17 10:53:44 AM
#414666   By their own admission, the SOC was niche loophole73 01/18/17 08:35:03 PM
#414665   But IDCC never tied their rate to a chip. bulldzr 01/18/17 08:15:15 PM
#414664   The Qcom model is in trouble because they loophole73 01/18/17 06:34:51 PM
#414663   In light of this, maybe we should be bulldzr 01/18/17 05:54:33 PM
#414662   FTC Accuses Qualcomm for Forcing Apple into iPhone Gamco 01/18/17 03:03:31 PM
#414661   O'dog thanks. my3sons87 01/18/17 02:35:31 PM
#414660   my3sons: Nothing new, that is the last docket entry. olddog967 01/18/17 02:33:38 PM
#414659   O'dog any updates on the following CAFC information my3sons87 01/18/17 01:49:31 PM
#414658   I decided I'm Not going to... jeffree 01/18/17 01:13:33 PM
#414657   jeffree The street also hasn't factored in that there mickeybritt 01/18/17 10:34:29 AM
#414656   a few of us here...believe InterDigital is a jeffree 01/18/17 10:21:15 AM
#414655   jjff No I don't but I think before the mickeybritt 01/18/17 10:05:08 AM
#414654   No need to respond, it was a joke! jjff 01/18/17 10:00:45 AM
#414653   Mickey do you receive a pay check from jjff 01/18/17 09:59:45 AM