SureTrader SPDR Advertisement SPDR Advertisement
Home > Boards > US Listed > Telecommunications Hardware >

InterDigital Communications (IDCC)

Add IDCC Price Alert      Hide Sticky   Hide Intro
Moderator: No Moderator JimLur, Data_Rox, magillagorilla, dndodd, olddog967, Hydro_gen
Search This Board:
Last Post: 8/3/2015 10:05:29 PM - Followers: 831 - Board type: Free - Posts Today: 0

About Message Boards and the Moderators' Role

The principle objective of the iHub message boards is to maintain a high signal-to-noise ratio while encouraging the exchange of all points of view. Moderators are an important part of making our message boards beneficial to all participants and readers. Moderating a stock-specific board, particularly those which are controversial due to many divergent perspectives or newsworthy events, can be a challenging and time consuming role. The time and effort expended by our Members who volunteer their time to fulfill this valuable role is greatly appreciated and our Moderators should be treated with the respect they deserve for donating their time and efforts to the collective benefit of our community. Company-specific boards are the lifeblood of iHub. The Moderators' role is simple to define for company-specific boards: 

To promote the civil exchange of on-topic dialog that complies with the Investors Hub Terms of Service.

It is no accident that neither the above definition nor the  Terms of Service makes mention of investment sentiment, shareholder interests, or considerations such as "the good of the company." That is because the TOS are blind to investment sentiment. In order to be a successful Moderator and conduct a board within the scope of iHub's TOS, it is critical that Moderators distinguish their role and privileges as Moderator from their role and privileges as a posting Member. That is often easier said than done, particularly on active boards with both the typical and atypical controversy.

At the same time, Board Moderators are entitled and encouraged to express their investment sentiment in the same manner as any other Member; by participating in the dialog. However; insofar as their Moderator privileges are concerned, it is not the Moderators’ role to dictate bullish or bearish sentiment, to command the "tone" of the content be along any particular investment sentiment, or to favor one investment sentiment over another when removing or restoring messages.

It is also not the Moderators’ role to remove posts on the basis of "truth" or "accuracy". Readers determine the veracity of the posts they read and the credibility of other Posters. If a Moderator disagrees with another Member’s post they have the same recourse as any other User; to ignore the post, or to challenge it with a post of their own focusing on the information, not the other Poster.

In short, the role of the Moderator is to help foster an environment that promotes and encourages posting of ALL opinions and information about companies, regardless of the bullish or bearish sentiment of the posts, and to be the site’s first line of defense in ensuring we remain free of spam, vulgarity, and personal attacks.


Deletion of Posts

While in manage mode, Moderators will see a message that says "Click any message below to view, then remove or restore it." Clicking on a specific post will then show the option to "remove" in a box on the left. Clicking this will then provide the following options as a reason for removal: Personal Attack, Duplicate Post, Spam, Off Topic, Vulgarity, Author Asked to Remove, Violation of Privacy, Threat.


This is an accidental duplicate post by a single Member. This does not mean a similar message posted previously or the same content posted by a different Member.

Personal Attack

This is when someone attacks one or more members personally rather than the content of that Member's message. The post does not have to be addressed to the "target" of the attack to be considered a Personal Attack. If it attacks a messenger rather than the message, it qualifies for deletion and it is expected that Moderators will remove it.

Posting the same or similar content to more than two (2) boards within a calendar day;
Posting the same or almost identical post more than twice within a calendar day i.e. "where's the PR?", "anyone seen the PR?", "thought there was going to be a pr today?", "geez, is the pr coming out today or not?";
Sending the same or similar unsolicited PM to multiple recipients   

Off Topic
  • Posts about or focusing on other Members or groups of people and their reasons for posting on the board (i.e. "XYZDownDaDrain" is just a basher, ignore him", "XYZToDaMoon" is a pumper", "the naysayers are very loud today", "c'mon, where did all the cheerleaders go?"). The post does not have to be addressed to a specific person. If the post is about other Users then it should be removed.
    Posts with religious or political statements should be removed as "off topic". These inevitably create an avalanche of replies that are off topic as well.
    Posts about Moderators and/or deletions are also "off topic". Issues of this nature need to be discussed with a Site Admin.
    Putting "ot" at the beginning of a post does not make it acceptable. It is still off topic and eligible for removal.

  • The PG13 rule is loosely used as a guideline to what is/isn't acceptable when determining whether a comment is vulgar. The theory is that if society has deemed it appropriate for a 13 year old to hear, it is unlikely that it will be offensive to the majority of Users.
    Otherwise, profanity (as explained above) is unacceptable on the stock boards, even when punctuation characters are used to "fill in the blanks" or letters are changed (f**k, azzh*le, etc.). Note that there are also "polite versions" for many acronyms and these are assumed to be the case when in doubt (i.e. "wtf?" = "what the freak?" in the polite version).
    Any form of vulgarity directed at another User is unacceptable and should be removed (i.e. "you're a sh*thead", "being an a** doesn't help your case").

Author Asked to Remove

Violation of Privacy
Posting of what the Member believes to be any personally identifiable information (email, real name, phone, address, etc.) about another User or posting the contents of a private message is a privacy violation. For example, if a Member posts that "XYZDownDaDrain is actually Bob Smith", whether the information is accurate is irrelevant. The Member was trying to disclose personal information. This is a serious violation and can get you suspended or terminated from the site.
Posting or referring to the contents of private messages without the author's prior consent is considered a violation of privacy and can get the User suspended or terminated from the site.

A Member threatening any other Member in any fashion is to be removed.
Threats or insinuations of violence or physical harm against anyone is a serious infraction and can get you suspended or terminated from the site.

If a post does not fit into any of these categories the post must not be removed.

Some posts fall into a "gray" area and are borderline depending upon the way they are read. As inclusion is favored over exclusion, please err or the side of not removing posts if they are not clear violations. Please use the "Report TOS Violation" button at the bottom of the post with your comments if the post is not egregious in nature and Site Admins will review the message.

Bottom line: Please use your best judgment in removing posts based on the above guidelines and let us know if you have any questions or need any help. And keep in mind that post removal and non-removal have to be given the same emphasis. It is not permissible, for example, to remove a post that calls someone a "pumper" while not also removing a post that calls someone a "basher". Investor sentiment, including your own, can NOT be part of the removal/non-removal decision.

Image:Ra1.gif More guidance about acceptable removal of posts can be found at FAQ:Deletions and Restores.

  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 2M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 2Y
  • 3Y
  • 5Y
Current Price
Bid Ask Day's Range
IDCC News: Quarterly Report (10-q) 07/30/2015 08:44:42 AM
IDCC News: Current Report Filing (8-k) 07/30/2015 08:40:16 AM
IDCC News: Statement of Changes in Beneficial Ownership (4) 07/23/2015 05:01:47 PM
IDCC News: Statement of Changes in Beneficial Ownership (4) 07/23/2015 04:57:37 PM
IDCC News: Statement of Changes in Beneficial Ownership (4) 07/23/2015 04:53:40 PM
#392981  Sticky Note Let's make it simple: Fog1937 12/02/14 10:38:12 AM
#382423  Sticky Note Sticky info: Analyst Reports, Rmarchma Reference Information, etc. postyle 02/21/14 03:45:14 PM
#402085   Interesting Panel……Maybe we could all chip in for magillagorilla 08/03/15 10:05:29 PM
#402084   So, I suppose Samsung erred big time by Gungrey 08/03/15 09:47:17 PM
#402083   Jist, I'm jist curious if you have skin Gungrey 08/03/15 09:38:49 PM
#402082   Mick, You do not ask the right jist1 08/03/15 07:26:05 PM
#402080   Thank you. lando1 08/03/15 07:12:51 PM
#402079   jist1 Do you honestly think Nokia hasn't infringed the mickeybritt 08/03/15 07:11:57 PM
#402078   lando, I suggest reading OD's posts along jist1 08/03/15 06:53:53 PM
#402077   when they sell off Apple like they've done Limejuice22 08/03/15 06:27:25 PM
#402076   No just a generally lousy market and the dndodd 08/03/15 05:21:34 PM
#402075   Anyone or all, I have been out of lando1 08/03/15 05:14:15 PM
#402074   OD..Thank you. eom hock1 08/03/15 04:33:39 PM
#402073   That was my thinking and why I posted it. dndodd 08/03/15 04:07:57 PM
#402072   hock; As I previously posted the notes issued olddog967 08/03/15 03:57:34 PM
#402071   Mick, each person needs to decide for themselves, jist1 08/03/15 02:52:12 PM
#402070   jist1 What should others do cry? Should they sell? mickeybritt 08/03/15 02:32:32 PM
#402069   gejebr3......Hopefully OD or someone can clarify, but it hock1 08/03/15 02:30:25 PM
#402068   Yes Mick, Life is full of ups and jist1 08/03/15 02:16:17 PM
#402067   with that kind of predictable revenue stream (and gejebr3 08/03/15 02:10:15 PM
#402066   Data_Rox You can't have any fun if you mickeybritt 08/03/15 02:04:13 PM
#402065   Unless some of you want to loan me mickeybritt 08/03/15 02:00:42 PM
#402064   dndodd....With a definitive statement like that, one would hock1 08/03/15 01:58:29 PM
#402063   My guess is IDCC is hopefully buying back sonic22 08/03/15 01:15:29 PM
#402062   Management should buy some at these levels, plus pochemunyet 08/03/15 01:15:04 PM
#402061   a research effort comes to fruition? gejebr3 08/03/15 12:48:59 PM
#402060   Interdigital Becomes Oversold (IDCC) dndodd 08/03/15 12:45:55 PM
#402059   Yes. I have actually. This stock is going scruffynyc1 08/03/15 12:45:37 PM
#402058   "At $400 million, our royalty platform has roughly dndodd 08/03/15 12:33:55 PM
#402057   have you considered buying your opinions for what Limejuice22 08/03/15 12:24:07 PM
#402056   I can't afford to do anything scruffynyc1 08/03/15 12:20:11 PM
#402055   Microsoft bests Google in patent case appeal Gamco 08/03/15 12:19:54 PM
#402054   under 53 fishin'? Data_Rox 08/03/15 12:13:49 PM
#402053   I think your WAG is just slightly more jist1 08/03/15 12:06:32 PM
#402052   The only one who is missing from your triangle 08/03/15 11:52:32 AM
#402051   you should load up on puts or short, Limejuice22 08/03/15 11:50:51 AM
#402050   I am predicting we will touch 40 after scruffynyc1 08/03/15 11:44:19 AM
#402049   Sorry I disagree. If future earnings are expected jist1 08/03/15 11:41:09 AM
#402048   We have seen this before and it had triangle 08/03/15 11:37:42 AM
#402047   Hmmm, the blood letting continues. Gungrey 08/03/15 11:34:38 AM
#402046   Agreed $75 is a reasonable price if you jist1 08/03/15 11:31:45 AM
#402045   China Mobile HK, Ericsson demo LTE-A FDD+TDD 3CC CA Gamco 08/03/15 11:30:45 AM
#402044   "A loss will not affect earning" triangle 08/03/15 11:21:59 AM
#402043   Compare these two press releases both dated August 3rd: Gamco 08/03/15 11:19:35 AM
#402042   jjff...We should have guidance for Q3 before the hock1 08/03/15 11:08:43 AM
#402041   You can now get DirecTV on your AT&T Gamco 08/03/15 11:07:18 AM
#402040   If everyone thinks we are going to lose dndodd 08/03/15 11:06:09 AM
#402039   You sure you're asking the right guy? jist1 08/03/15 11:04:40 AM
#402038   If we lose at the ITC end of jjff 08/03/15 10:53:07 AM
#402037   Thanks JimLur 08/03/15 10:13:24 AM
#402036   The long term deal with Samsung has worked triangle 08/03/15 10:12:19 AM
#402035   thankfully I'm just a little more disciplined and Data_Rox 08/03/15 09:53:50 AM