SureTrader
Home > Boards > US Listed > Telecommunications Hardware >

InterDigital Communications (IDCC)

IDCC RSS Feed
Add IDCC Price Alert      Hide Sticky   Hide Intro
Moderator: JimLur, Data_Rox, magillagorilla, dndodd, olddog967, Hydro_gen
Search This Board:
Last Post: 8/28/2016 5:37:48 PM - Followers: 844 - Board type: Free - Posts Today: 8



http://www.interdigital.com

About Message Boards and the Moderators' Role

The principle objective of the iHub message boards is to maintain a high signal-to-noise ratio while encouraging the exchange of all points of view. Moderators are an important part of making our message boards beneficial to all participants and readers. Moderating a stock-specific board, particularly those which are controversial due to many divergent perspectives or newsworthy events, can be a challenging and time consuming role. The time and effort expended by our Members who volunteer their time to fulfill this valuable role is greatly appreciated and our Moderators should be treated with the respect they deserve for donating their time and efforts to the collective benefit of our community. Company-specific boards are the lifeblood of iHub. The Moderators' role is simple to define for company-specific boards: 
 

To promote the civil exchange of on-topic dialog that complies with the Investors Hub Terms of Service.
 

It is no accident that neither the above definition nor the  Terms of Service makes mention of investment sentiment, shareholder interests, or considerations such as "the good of the company." That is because the TOS are blind to investment sentiment. In order to be a successful Moderator and conduct a board within the scope of iHub's TOS, it is critical that Moderators distinguish their role and privileges as Moderator from their role and privileges as a posting Member. That is often easier said than done, particularly on active boards with both the typical and atypical controversy.

At the same time, Board Moderators are entitled and encouraged to express their investment sentiment in the same manner as any other Member; by participating in the dialog. However; insofar as their Moderator privileges are concerned, it is not the Moderators’ role to dictate bullish or bearish sentiment, to command the "tone" of the content be along any particular investment sentiment, or to favor one investment sentiment over another when removing or restoring messages.

It is also not the Moderators’ role to remove posts on the basis of "truth" or "accuracy". Readers determine the veracity of the posts they read and the credibility of other Posters. If a Moderator disagrees with another Member’s post they have the same recourse as any other User; to ignore the post, or to challenge it with a post of their own focusing on the information, not the other Poster.

In short, the role of the Moderator is to help foster an environment that promotes and encourages posting of ALL opinions and information about companies, regardless of the bullish or bearish sentiment of the posts, and to be the site’s first line of defense in ensuring we remain free of spam, vulgarity, and personal attacks.

 

Deletion of Posts

While in manage mode, Moderators will see a message that says "Click any message below to view, then remove or restore it." Clicking on a specific post will then show the option to "remove" in a box on the left. Clicking this will then provide the following options as a reason for removal: Personal Attack, Duplicate Post, Spam, Off Topic, Vulgarity, Author Asked to Remove, Violation of Privacy, Threat.

Duplicate

This is an accidental duplicate post by a single Member. This does not mean a similar message posted previously or the same content posted by a different Member.

Personal Attack

This is when someone attacks one or more members personally rather than the content of that Member's message. The post does not have to be addressed to the "target" of the attack to be considered a Personal Attack. If it attacks a messenger rather than the message, it qualifies for deletion and it is expected that Moderators will remove it.

Spam
Posting the same or similar content to more than two (2) boards within a calendar day;
Posting the same or almost identical post more than twice within a calendar day i.e. "where's the PR?", "anyone seen the PR?", "thought there was going to be a pr today?", "geez, is the pr coming out today or not?";
Sending the same or similar unsolicited PM to multiple recipients   

Off Topic
  • Posts about or focusing on other Members or groups of people and their reasons for posting on the board (i.e. "XYZDownDaDrain" is just a basher, ignore him", "XYZToDaMoon" is a pumper", "the naysayers are very loud today", "c'mon, where did all the cheerleaders go?"). The post does not have to be addressed to a specific person. If the post is about other Users then it should be removed.
    Posts with religious or political statements should be removed as "off topic". These inevitably create an avalanche of replies that are off topic as well.
    Posts about Moderators and/or deletions are also "off topic". Issues of this nature need to be discussed with a Site Admin.
    Putting "ot" at the beginning of a post does not make it acceptable. It is still off topic and eligible for removal.

Vulgarity
  • The PG13 rule is loosely used as a guideline to what is/isn't acceptable when determining whether a comment is vulgar. The theory is that if society has deemed it appropriate for a 13 year old to hear, it is unlikely that it will be offensive to the majority of Users.
    Otherwise, profanity (as explained above) is unacceptable on the stock boards, even when punctuation characters are used to "fill in the blanks" or letters are changed (f**k, azzh*le, etc.). Note that there are also "polite versions" for many acronyms and these are assumed to be the case when in doubt (i.e. "wtf?" = "what the freak?" in the polite version).
    Any form of vulgarity directed at another User is unacceptable and should be removed (i.e. "you're a sh*thead", "being an a** doesn't help your case").

Author Asked to Remove

Violation of Privacy
Posting of what the Member believes to be any personally identifiable information (email, real name, phone, address, etc.) about another User or posting the contents of a private message is a privacy violation. For example, if a Member posts that "XYZDownDaDrain is actually Bob Smith", whether the information is accurate is irrelevant. The Member was trying to disclose personal information. This is a serious violation and can get you suspended or terminated from the site.
Posting or referring to the contents of private messages without the author's prior consent is considered a violation of privacy and can get the User suspended or terminated from the site.

Threat
A Member threatening any other Member in any fashion is to be removed.
Threats or insinuations of violence or physical harm against anyone is a serious infraction and can get you suspended or terminated from the site.

If a post does not fit into any of these categories the post must not be removed.

Some posts fall into a "gray" area and are borderline depending upon the way they are read. As inclusion is favored over exclusion, please err or the side of not removing posts if they are not clear violations. Please use the "Report TOS Violation" button at the bottom of the post with your comments if the post is not egregious in nature and Site Admins will review the message.

Bottom line: Please use your best judgment in removing posts based on the above guidelines and let us know if you have any questions or need any help. And keep in mind that post removal and non-removal have to be given the same emphasis. It is not permissible, for example, to remove a post that calls someone a "pumper" while not also removing a post that calls someone a "basher". Investor sentiment, including your own, can NOT be part of the removal/non-removal decision.

Image:Ra1.gif More guidance about acceptable removal of posts can be found at FAQ:Deletions and Restores.

  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 2M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 2Y
  • 3Y
  • 5Y
IDCC
Current Price
Volume:
Bid Ask Day's Range
SureTrader
IDCC News: InterDigital and Sharp Corporation Expand Patent License Agreement to Include LTE Coverage 08/17/2016 08:30:00 AM
IDCC News: CORRECTION – InterDigital Announces Financial Results for Second Quarter 2016 08/02/2016 09:58:34 AM
IDCC News: Quarterly Report (10-q) 08/02/2016 08:46:35 AM
IDCC News: Current Report Filing (8-k) 08/02/2016 08:39:41 AM
IDCC News: InterDigital Announces Financial Results for Second Quarter 2016 08/02/2016 08:30:00 AM
PostSubject
#382423  Sticky Note Sticky info: Analyst Reports, Rmarchma Reference Information, etc. postyle 02/21/14 03:45:14 PM
#411044   MICKEY, YOU HAVE ALWAYS BEEN THE IDCC NOSTRA jjff 08/28/16 10:15:24 AM
#411043   jjgg A fist by the street, but certainly not mickeybritt 08/28/16 09:55:46 AM
#411042   That projection was a first!!!!!!!!!!! jjff 08/28/16 09:27:52 AM
#411041   LA, FWIW zombywolf 08/28/16 09:14:21 AM
#411040   jjff Yep damn shame they low balled it but mickeybritt 08/28/16 08:59:13 AM
#411039   $115.20 TARGET? jjff 08/28/16 08:35:40 AM
#411038   Is InterDigital, Inc.’s Fuel Running Low? The Stock Paullee 08/27/16 11:20:59 PM
#411037   I am certain you are not the only la-idcc-fan 08/27/16 09:37:32 PM
#411036   Simple math says the company is undervalued, if Limejuice22 08/27/16 07:06:04 PM
#411035   Poche, good post! Me too. The bulldzr 08/27/16 06:54:09 PM
#411031   While pondering the recent rise in share price, pochemunyet 08/27/16 05:31:45 PM
#411028   olddog You are right there is a hell of mickeybritt 08/27/16 08:04:54 AM
#411027   mickey: I don’t think you understand the olddog967 08/26/16 10:14:23 PM
#411026   Apparently under Pennsylvania corporate law, where IDCC is olddog967 08/26/16 08:47:09 PM
#411025   olddog I think the total outstanding shares is 35 mickeybritt 08/26/16 08:43:30 PM
#411024   scruffnyc!: I thought it is obvious, but olddog967 08/26/16 08:33:42 PM
#411023   What am I missing.... Certainly doesn't seem like scruffynyc1 08/26/16 08:26:28 PM
#411022   bulldzr: From the 10-Q. The shares olddog967 08/26/16 08:06:51 PM
#411021   Olddog, thanks. As of now, what are bulldzr 08/26/16 07:16:22 PM
#411020   Nice comeback today for the stock... and remember, bulldzr 08/26/16 07:06:24 PM
#411019   Jim, what this stock needs first is zombywolf 08/26/16 07:00:37 PM
#411018   Mickey: Based on data as of 30 olddog967 08/26/16 05:10:39 PM
#411017   a Slow Squeeze... jeffree 08/26/16 04:52:46 PM
#411016   Mickey , Have no idea if your right JimLur 08/26/16 04:22:55 PM
#411015   JimLur They could do a 2 1/2 for 1 mickeybritt 08/26/16 03:41:08 PM
#411014   Nice recovery. We may end up over $70 pochemunyet 08/26/16 03:34:25 PM
#411013   Mickey , I'm pretty sure if they wanted JimLur 08/26/16 03:28:05 PM
#411012   How valuable is IDCC's 5G edgehaul mW small orientbull 08/26/16 02:44:45 PM
#411011   JimLur You are right but they are very close. mickeybritt 08/26/16 02:15:45 PM
#411010   Fish the predictive model is developed after all my3sons87 08/26/16 12:13:49 PM
#411009   All-time Highs la-idcc-fan 08/26/16 11:17:15 AM
#411008   Is today a significant date with the Paris felix7 08/26/16 11:10:43 AM
#411007   Not quite -- One would be waiting for FISH21049 08/26/16 11:10:01 AM
#411006   That's easy "zeroreeno" nessco 08/26/16 11:02:09 AM
#411005   My guess: most of them. la-idcc-fan 08/26/16 11:01:31 AM
#411004   Folks, there's got to be something happening; this pochemunyet 08/26/16 11:01:29 AM
#411003   How many 'Longs' and 'Old Timers' would be FISH21049 08/26/16 10:57:50 AM
#411002   How can they establish a predictive 5 year FISH21049 08/26/16 10:53:39 AM
#411001   JimLur you are correct. AS I recall Hydro_gen 08/26/16 10:50:49 AM
#411000   Fish, all of my statements were forward looking, my3sons87 08/26/16 10:50:38 AM
#410999   Fish, a reverse split is not worth it. my3sons87 08/26/16 10:49:17 AM
#410998   Mickey B, IDCC cannot just split the shares my3sons87 08/26/16 10:46:56 AM
#410997   m3s: How can we have 'stable income sources FISH21049 08/26/16 10:46:37 AM
#410996   la-idcc-fan, at times demand drives price and other my3sons87 08/26/16 10:44:00 AM
#410995   Mickey, I don't think there's enough shares to JimLur 08/26/16 10:42:34 AM
#410994   m3s, so why not do a 'reverse split' FISH21049 08/26/16 10:40:33 AM
#410993   JimLur I think the split will be 3 for mickeybritt 08/26/16 10:35:52 AM
#410991   O ld Revenue Estimates Now Obsolete (That was my scruffynyc1 08/26/16 10:29:27 AM
#410990   I hope this "low price" becomes a new la-idcc-fan 08/26/16 10:25:17 AM
#410989   A company's free float refers to the number JimLur 08/26/16 10:23:56 AM
PostSubject