SureTrader
Cannabis Stocks News
Interactive Brokers Advertisement
Home > Boards > US Listed > Telecommunications Hardware >

InterDigital Communications (IDCC)

IDCC RSS Feed
Add IDCC Price Alert      Hide Sticky   Hide Intro
Moderator: JimLur, dmiller, dndodd, pochemunyet, olddog967, Hydro_gen
Search This Board: 
Last Post: 9/22/2017 8:57:44 PM - Followers: 861 - Board type: Free - Posts Today: 0



http://www.interdigital.com

About Message Boards and the Moderators' Role

The principle objective of the iHub message boards is to maintain a high signal-to-noise ratio while encouraging the exchange of all points of view. Moderators are an important part of making our message boards beneficial to all participants and readers. Moderating a stock-specific board, particularly those which are controversial due to many divergent perspectives or newsworthy events, can be a challenging and time consuming role. The time and effort expended by our Members who volunteer their time to fulfill this valuable role is greatly appreciated and our Moderators should be treated with the respect they deserve for donating their time and efforts to the collective benefit of our community. Company-specific boards are the lifeblood of iHub. The Moderators' role is simple to define for company-specific boards: 
 

To promote the civil exchange of on-topic dialog that complies with the Investors Hub Terms of Service.
 

It is no accident that neither the above definition nor the  Terms of Service makes mention of investment sentiment, shareholder interests, or considerations such as "the good of the company." That is because the TOS are blind to investment sentiment. In order to be a successful Moderator and conduct a board within the scope of iHub's TOS, it is critical that Moderators distinguish their role and privileges as Moderator from their role and privileges as a posting Member. That is often easier said than done, particularly on active boards with both the typical and atypical controversy.

At the same time, Board Moderators are entitled and encouraged to express their investment sentiment in the same manner as any other Member; by participating in the dialog. However; insofar as their Moderator privileges are concerned, it is not the Moderators’ role to dictate bullish or bearish sentiment, to command the "tone" of the content be along any particular investment sentiment, or to favor one investment sentiment over another when removing or restoring messages.

It is also not the Moderators’ role to remove posts on the basis of "truth" or "accuracy". Readers determine the veracity of the posts they read and the credibility of other Posters. If a Moderator disagrees with another Member’s post they have the same recourse as any other User; to ignore the post, or to challenge it with a post of their own focusing on the information, not the other Poster.

In short, the role of the Moderator is to help foster an environment that promotes and encourages posting of ALL opinions and information about companies, regardless of the bullish or bearish sentiment of the posts, and to be the site’s first line of defense in ensuring we remain free of spam, vulgarity, and personal attacks.

 

Deletion of Posts

While in manage mode, Moderators will see a message that says "Click any message below to view, then remove or restore it." Clicking on a specific post will then show the option to "remove" in a box on the left. Clicking this will then provide the following options as a reason for removal: Personal Attack, Duplicate Post, Spam, Off Topic, Vulgarity, Author Asked to Remove, Violation of Privacy, Threat.

Duplicate

This is an accidental duplicate post by a single Member. This does not mean a similar message posted previously or the same content posted by a different Member.

Personal Attack

This is when someone attacks one or more members personally rather than the content of that Member's message. The post does not have to be addressed to the "target" of the attack to be considered a Personal Attack. If it attacks a messenger rather than the message, it qualifies for deletion and it is expected that Moderators will remove it.

Spam
Posting the same or similar content to more than two (2) boards within a calendar day;
Posting the same or almost identical post more than twice within a calendar day i.e. "where's the PR?", "anyone seen the PR?", "thought there was going to be a pr today?", "geez, is the pr coming out today or not?";
Sending the same or similar unsolicited PM to multiple recipients   

Off Topic
  • Posts about or focusing on other Members or groups of people and their reasons for posting on the board (i.e. "XYZDownDaDrain" is just a basher, ignore him", "XYZToDaMoon" is a pumper", "the naysayers are very loud today", "c'mon, where did all the cheerleaders go?"). The post does not have to be addressed to a specific person. If the post is about other Users then it should be removed.
    Posts with religious or political statements should be removed as "off topic". These inevitably create an avalanche of replies that are off topic as well.
    Posts about Moderators and/or deletions are also "off topic". Issues of this nature need to be discussed with a Site Admin.
    Putting "ot" at the beginning of a post does not make it acceptable. It is still off topic and eligible for removal.

Vulgarity
  • The PG13 rule is loosely used as a guideline to what is/isn't acceptable when determining whether a comment is vulgar. The theory is that if society has deemed it appropriate for a 13 year old to hear, it is unlikely that it will be offensive to the majority of Users.
    Otherwise, profanity (as explained above) is unacceptable on the stock boards, even when punctuation characters are used to "fill in the blanks" or letters are changed (f**k, azzh*le, etc.). Note that there are also "polite versions" for many acronyms and these are assumed to be the case when in doubt (i.e. "wtf?" = "what the freak?" in the polite version).
    Any form of vulgarity directed at another User is unacceptable and should be removed (i.e. "you're a sh*thead", "being an a** doesn't help your case").

Author Asked to Remove

Violation of Privacy
Posting of what the Member believes to be any personally identifiable information (email, real name, phone, address, etc.) about another User or posting the contents of a private message is a privacy violation. For example, if a Member posts that "XYZDownDaDrain is actually Bob Smith", whether the information is accurate is irrelevant. The Member was trying to disclose personal information. This is a serious violation and can get you suspended or terminated from the site.
Posting or referring to the contents of private messages without the author's prior consent is considered a violation of privacy and can get the User suspended or terminated from the site.

Threat
A Member threatening any other Member in any fashion is to be removed.
Threats or insinuations of violence or physical harm against anyone is a serious infraction and can get you suspended or terminated from the site.

If a post does not fit into any of these categories the post must not be removed.

Some posts fall into a "gray" area and are borderline depending upon the way they are read. As inclusion is favored over exclusion, please err or the side of not removing posts if they are not clear violations. Please use the "Report TOS Violation" button at the bottom of the post with your comments if the post is not egregious in nature and Site Admins will review the message.

Bottom line: Please use your best judgment in removing posts based on the above guidelines and let us know if you have any questions or need any help. And keep in mind that post removal and non-removal have to be given the same emphasis. It is not permissible, for example, to remove a post that calls someone a "pumper" while not also removing a post that calls someone a "basher". Investor sentiment, including your own, can NOT be part of the removal/non-removal decision.

Image:Ra1.gif More guidance about acceptable removal of posts can be found at FAQ:Deletions and Restores.

SureTrader
Cannabis Stocks News
Interactive Brokers Advertisement
IDCC
Current Price
Volume:
Bid Ask Day's Range
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 2M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 2Y
  • 3Y
  • 5Y
IDCC News: InterDigital Expands Footprint in Europe With Opening of Berlin Office 09/21/2017 03:00:00 AM
IDCC News: InterDigital Announces Increases of Regular Quarterly Cash Dividend and Stock Buyback Authorization 09/14/2017 05:19:19 PM
IDCC News: InterDigital to Present at Dougherty & Company Institutional Investor Conference 09/11/2017 05:30:00 PM
IDCC News: InterDigital Issues Revenue Guidance for Third Quarter 2017 08/22/2017 08:30:00 AM
IDCC News: InterDigital Announces World’s First Successful Mobile Edge Computing 5G Network Architecture Trial 08/14/2017 08:30:00 AM
PostSubject
#419166  Sticky Note InterDigital Announces Increases of Regular Quarterly Cash Dividend Gamco 09/14/17 05:36:49 PM
#419242   thanks ol' dog doctor md 09/22/17 08:57:44 PM
#419241   olddog, the institution could be IDCC? or do squingeqbob 09/22/17 07:31:08 PM
#419240   FISH/doctor: The large after hours trades reported olddog967 09/22/17 06:45:25 PM
#419239   Jimlur, I would be happy to share with vegas options 09/22/17 06:36:43 PM
#419238   As I recall, on Thursday there was also FISH21049 09/22/17 05:20:17 PM
#419237   It looks like some substantial after hours buying doctor md 09/22/17 04:58:23 PM
#419236   Vegas, What in the money calls has your JimLur 09/22/17 04:26:47 PM
#419235   Jeffree, I have been bidding for size in vegas options 09/22/17 02:55:10 PM
#419234   Thinking back many years ago, the company did dws 09/22/17 10:19:54 AM
#419233   or as Merritt has claimed... jeffree 09/22/17 10:09:46 AM
#419232   jeffree, the shares trade in both Heaven and my3sons87 09/22/17 09:50:44 AM
#419231   IF the world survives Sept. 23 (tomorrow)...then jeffree 09/22/17 08:58:57 AM
#419230   Something is gonna pop here soon... within the bulldzr 09/22/17 01:18:31 AM
#419229   LOL. Ship that article to all the unsigned!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! jjff 09/21/17 04:20:33 PM
#419228   investorshub.advfn.com/uimage/uploads/2017/9/21/wzqnkpic.jpg JimLur 09/21/17 10:12:02 AM
#419227   O'dog the Berlin Office is a smart move my3sons87 09/21/17 08:40:10 AM
#419226   What Google Wants With HTC’s Smartphone Business Paullee 09/21/17 07:42:28 AM
#419225   InterDigital Expands Footprint in Europe With Opening of olddog967 09/21/17 04:31:12 AM
#419224   patopinion: IDCC's current bylaws recognizes the existence olddog967 09/20/17 09:03:54 PM
#419223   Olddog, if the proposed change becomes law it patopinion 09/20/17 08:38:40 PM
#419222   patopinion: The rule that you are referring olddog967 09/20/17 08:25:19 PM
#419220   "If there are any proposals to come before patopinion 09/20/17 06:06:21 PM
#419219   IDCC After Hours Volume: Gamco 09/20/17 05:13:31 PM
#419218   any other company that acquires idc could do mister 09/20/17 05:00:51 PM
#419217   add Google as a "potential acquirer" of IDCC...??? jeffree 09/20/17 03:49:51 PM
#419216   Fish As I hinted in my earlier post (#419198), la-idcc-fan 09/20/17 01:48:02 PM
#419215   Recent joiners Lenovo, Verizon and Conversant suggest Via’s Gamco 09/20/17 01:25:50 PM
#419214   I propose they all step down..enough of this mister 09/20/17 11:42:28 AM
#419213   As the end of the year rapidly approaches, FISH21049 09/20/17 11:24:40 AM
#419212   We need some BIG news in order to FISH21049 09/20/17 11:06:03 AM
#419211   How rich do you think these IDCC MARKET jjff 09/20/17 11:01:00 AM
#419210   We ever going to get a upward move jjff 09/20/17 10:58:27 AM
#419209   Back on 9-15 when the BOD announced a FISH21049 09/20/17 10:54:51 AM
#419208   Presentation stops at 28:30, right after Merritt says squingeqbob 09/20/17 08:15:57 AM
#419207   did the last 3 minutes play for you, Paullee 09/20/17 07:18:05 AM
#419206   Paullee; Thanks. I found the olddog967 09/19/17 11:28:46 PM
#419205   try this link Paullee 09/19/17 10:34:15 PM
#419204   NEITHER COULD I. Looks like they screwed Paullee 09/19/17 08:35:40 PM
#419203   Paullee: I couldn't find the webcast on olddog967 09/19/17 07:55:33 PM
#419202   Paullee no I did not listen. Did you? my3sons87 09/19/17 07:24:33 PM
#419201   anyone listen to presentation today ? thoughts ? Paullee 09/19/17 06:27:02 PM
#419200   United States Patent 9,769,692 Gamco 09/19/17 10:27:53 AM
#419199   United States Patent 9,769,843 Gamco 09/19/17 10:27:03 AM
#419198   When IDCC first announced a dividend on Dec la-idcc-fan 09/18/17 01:28:59 PM
#419197   The Div increase and buyback announcement was a felix7 09/18/17 11:48:50 AM
#419196   Today's Research Reports on Stocks to Watch: InterDigital FISH21049 09/18/17 09:00:24 AM
#419195   LTE - Thank you for the posts relating Gamco 09/17/17 02:05:18 PM
#419194   <<PTAB judges do not have a code of LTE 09/16/17 11:32:12 AM
#419193   Paullee: One idea to try and avoid olddog967 09/16/17 11:13:06 AM
#419192   The failed PTAB experiment has been a colossal mistake Paullee 09/16/17 08:37:03 AM
PostSubject