SureTrader Nadex Advertisement
Home > Boards > US Listed > Telecommunications Hardware >

InterDigital Communications (IDCC)

Add IDCC Price Alert      Hide Sticky   Hide Intro
Moderator: JimLur, dndodd, loophole73, olddog967, Hydro_gen
Search This Board: 
Last Post: 2/24/2017 9:41:17 AM - Followers: 855 - Board type: Free - Posts Today: 19

About Message Boards and the Moderators' Role

The principle objective of the iHub message boards is to maintain a high signal-to-noise ratio while encouraging the exchange of all points of view. Moderators are an important part of making our message boards beneficial to all participants and readers. Moderating a stock-specific board, particularly those which are controversial due to many divergent perspectives or newsworthy events, can be a challenging and time consuming role. The time and effort expended by our Members who volunteer their time to fulfill this valuable role is greatly appreciated and our Moderators should be treated with the respect they deserve for donating their time and efforts to the collective benefit of our community. Company-specific boards are the lifeblood of iHub. The Moderators' role is simple to define for company-specific boards: 

To promote the civil exchange of on-topic dialog that complies with the Investors Hub Terms of Service.

It is no accident that neither the above definition nor the  Terms of Service makes mention of investment sentiment, shareholder interests, or considerations such as "the good of the company." That is because the TOS are blind to investment sentiment. In order to be a successful Moderator and conduct a board within the scope of iHub's TOS, it is critical that Moderators distinguish their role and privileges as Moderator from their role and privileges as a posting Member. That is often easier said than done, particularly on active boards with both the typical and atypical controversy.

At the same time, Board Moderators are entitled and encouraged to express their investment sentiment in the same manner as any other Member; by participating in the dialog. However; insofar as their Moderator privileges are concerned, it is not the Moderators’ role to dictate bullish or bearish sentiment, to command the "tone" of the content be along any particular investment sentiment, or to favor one investment sentiment over another when removing or restoring messages.

It is also not the Moderators’ role to remove posts on the basis of "truth" or "accuracy". Readers determine the veracity of the posts they read and the credibility of other Posters. If a Moderator disagrees with another Member’s post they have the same recourse as any other User; to ignore the post, or to challenge it with a post of their own focusing on the information, not the other Poster.

In short, the role of the Moderator is to help foster an environment that promotes and encourages posting of ALL opinions and information about companies, regardless of the bullish or bearish sentiment of the posts, and to be the site’s first line of defense in ensuring we remain free of spam, vulgarity, and personal attacks.


Deletion of Posts

While in manage mode, Moderators will see a message that says "Click any message below to view, then remove or restore it." Clicking on a specific post will then show the option to "remove" in a box on the left. Clicking this will then provide the following options as a reason for removal: Personal Attack, Duplicate Post, Spam, Off Topic, Vulgarity, Author Asked to Remove, Violation of Privacy, Threat.


This is an accidental duplicate post by a single Member. This does not mean a similar message posted previously or the same content posted by a different Member.

Personal Attack

This is when someone attacks one or more members personally rather than the content of that Member's message. The post does not have to be addressed to the "target" of the attack to be considered a Personal Attack. If it attacks a messenger rather than the message, it qualifies for deletion and it is expected that Moderators will remove it.

Posting the same or similar content to more than two (2) boards within a calendar day;
Posting the same or almost identical post more than twice within a calendar day i.e. "where's the PR?", "anyone seen the PR?", "thought there was going to be a pr today?", "geez, is the pr coming out today or not?";
Sending the same or similar unsolicited PM to multiple recipients   

Off Topic
  • Posts about or focusing on other Members or groups of people and their reasons for posting on the board (i.e. "XYZDownDaDrain" is just a basher, ignore him", "XYZToDaMoon" is a pumper", "the naysayers are very loud today", "c'mon, where did all the cheerleaders go?"). The post does not have to be addressed to a specific person. If the post is about other Users then it should be removed.
    Posts with religious or political statements should be removed as "off topic". These inevitably create an avalanche of replies that are off topic as well.
    Posts about Moderators and/or deletions are also "off topic". Issues of this nature need to be discussed with a Site Admin.
    Putting "ot" at the beginning of a post does not make it acceptable. It is still off topic and eligible for removal.

  • The PG13 rule is loosely used as a guideline to what is/isn't acceptable when determining whether a comment is vulgar. The theory is that if society has deemed it appropriate for a 13 year old to hear, it is unlikely that it will be offensive to the majority of Users.
    Otherwise, profanity (as explained above) is unacceptable on the stock boards, even when punctuation characters are used to "fill in the blanks" or letters are changed (f**k, azzh*le, etc.). Note that there are also "polite versions" for many acronyms and these are assumed to be the case when in doubt (i.e. "wtf?" = "what the freak?" in the polite version).
    Any form of vulgarity directed at another User is unacceptable and should be removed (i.e. "you're a sh*thead", "being an a** doesn't help your case").

Author Asked to Remove

Violation of Privacy
Posting of what the Member believes to be any personally identifiable information (email, real name, phone, address, etc.) about another User or posting the contents of a private message is a privacy violation. For example, if a Member posts that "XYZDownDaDrain is actually Bob Smith", whether the information is accurate is irrelevant. The Member was trying to disclose personal information. This is a serious violation and can get you suspended or terminated from the site.
Posting or referring to the contents of private messages without the author's prior consent is considered a violation of privacy and can get the User suspended or terminated from the site.

A Member threatening any other Member in any fashion is to be removed.
Threats or insinuations of violence or physical harm against anyone is a serious infraction and can get you suspended or terminated from the site.

If a post does not fit into any of these categories the post must not be removed.

Some posts fall into a "gray" area and are borderline depending upon the way they are read. As inclusion is favored over exclusion, please err or the side of not removing posts if they are not clear violations. Please use the "Report TOS Violation" button at the bottom of the post with your comments if the post is not egregious in nature and Site Admins will review the message.

Bottom line: Please use your best judgment in removing posts based on the above guidelines and let us know if you have any questions or need any help. And keep in mind that post removal and non-removal have to be given the same emphasis. It is not permissible, for example, to remove a post that calls someone a "pumper" while not also removing a post that calls someone a "basher". Investor sentiment, including your own, can NOT be part of the removal/non-removal decision.

Image:Ra1.gif More guidance about acceptable removal of posts can be found at FAQ:Deletions and Restores.

  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 2M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 2Y
  • 3Y
  • 5Y
Current Price
Bid Ask Day's Range
IDCC News: Annual Report (10-k) 02/23/2017 08:52:36 AM
IDCC News: Current Report Filing (8-k) 02/23/2017 08:47:31 AM
IDCC News: InterDigital Reports Fourth Quarter and Full Year 2016 Financial Results 02/23/2017 08:30:00 AM
IDCC News: CA Technologies and InterDigital Partner on End-to-End IoT Solutions for Enterprise Customers 02/21/2017 05:00:00 AM
IDCC News: Annual Statement of Changes in Beneficial Ownership (5) 02/13/2017 04:45:34 PM
#415590   Feel free to use it FWIW. I believe loophole73 02/24/17 09:53:06 AM
#415589   OLED on a tear today........EOM dws 02/24/17 09:52:30 AM
#415588   Olddog The "street" apparently had a high estimate ($113.7 la-idcc-fan 02/24/17 09:41:17 AM
#415587   good post loop..would you send to patrick or asr1 02/24/17 09:06:20 AM
#415586   loophole73: I would agree with some of FISH21049 02/24/17 09:02:18 AM
#415585   Ok, I have had a chance to sleep loophole73 02/24/17 08:08:32 AM
#415584   From conference call things to look at especially mickeybritt 02/24/17 08:08:03 AM
#415583   Doing a quick calculation of Apple I get zdog 02/24/17 07:42:57 AM
#415582   ZTE Gets Another Reprieve From US Sanctions Paullee 02/24/17 07:30:45 AM
#415581   Great to see you posting, Mickey! pochemunyet 02/24/17 07:23:27 AM
#415580   olddog Trust me the revenues will be coming in mickeybritt 02/24/17 07:08:02 AM
#415579   Mickey, I agree with you that IoT in tradero 02/24/17 06:42:33 AM
#415578   all in all...a very goodyear and a good asr1 02/24/17 06:25:17 AM
#415577   Welcome back Mickey . I hope all is well. triangle 02/24/17 06:14:54 AM
#415576   great appears 2nd and 3rd quarters will asr1 02/24/17 06:12:18 AM
#415575   mickey: Welcome back. I see you olddog967 02/24/17 05:52:51 AM
#415574   Mickey, great to see you back and carrying dws 02/24/17 05:34:36 AM
#415573   ANNUAL REVENUE EXPECTATIONS OR GOALS!!!!!! mickeybritt 02/24/17 05:06:56 AM
#415571   ia-idcc-fan: What is this statement based on? olddog967 02/23/17 11:07:05 PM
#415565   A must read post for the analysts and squingeqbob 02/23/17 08:56:58 PM
#415564   On December 15, 2016, IDCC and Apple executed la-idcc-fan 02/23/17 08:22:36 PM
#415563   He actually said IF we were able to... zdog 02/23/17 08:12:08 PM
#415562   I never stopped following this stock. Just stopped dmiller 02/23/17 06:47:56 PM
#415561   Whew...... I didn't realize Dmiller had posted. You won't get scruffynyc1 02/23/17 06:43:29 PM
#415560   Dmilller. Based on your suggestions of DNDN felix7 02/23/17 06:41:14 PM
#415559   great question bim, but that is a question JohnSamuel 02/23/17 06:32:53 PM
#415558   From the transcript during Q/A bim524 02/23/17 06:15:30 PM
#415557   What does that prove? dmiller 02/23/17 06:11:06 PM
#415556   Agree...I added to my shares today all along LutherTiggs 02/23/17 04:43:47 PM
#415555   We beat on both eps and revenue. That MJPLIFE11 02/23/17 04:37:57 PM
#415554   From Seeking Alpha: InterDigital's CEO Bill Merritt JohnSamuel 02/23/17 04:34:20 PM
#415553   power11: you said [color=red BUY IN TODAY BETWEEN FISH21049 02/23/17 04:33:52 PM
#415552   Let's hope the new administration will support patent JohnSamuel 02/23/17 04:31:41 PM
#415551   Investing/trading this more like jeffree 02/23/17 04:29:10 PM
#415550   This company/stock is interesting. Kind of like LutherTiggs 02/23/17 04:14:53 PM
#415549   indeed ... we begin again, but the good JohnSamuel 02/23/17 03:54:15 PM
#415548   wonder how many new shorts we have?I bet asr1 02/23/17 03:48:36 PM
#415547   For every sell, there is also a buyer... bulldzr 02/23/17 03:44:38 PM
#415546   you are right ddutta ... that is very JohnSamuel 02/23/17 03:29:22 PM
#415545   time to buy some strategic companies.. asr1 02/23/17 03:06:44 PM
#415544   Well, when I first looked, I could have nicmar 02/23/17 03:00:44 PM
#415543   Another very strong statement from 10-K: ddutta 02/23/17 02:41:23 PM
#415542   Some details from 10-K: ddutta 02/23/17 02:28:37 PM
#415541   Point taken. But if no incentive for LutherTiggs 02/23/17 02:25:58 PM
#415540   The we play nice might get old, but felix7 02/23/17 02:14:14 PM
#415539   Reading between the lines from Merritt, IDCC is LutherTiggs 02/23/17 02:03:42 PM
#415538   My apologies. Saw that and revised my post. redviking 02/23/17 01:06:30 PM
#415537   Cumputer Generated Pressure KAJO7710 02/23/17 01:04:20 PM
#415536   OUCH!!!!!!!! They managed to butcher the stock again for triangle 02/23/17 01:02:40 PM
#415535   All the recent articles discuss how IDCC is eagle-i13 02/23/17 12:43:47 PM