InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 184
Posts 33260
Boards Moderated 8
Alias Born 04/14/2010

Re: JohnnyRotton post# 23250

Thursday, 01/18/2024 11:40:54 AM

Thursday, January 18, 2024 11:40:54 AM

Post# of 23562
Get this... Paul Rachmuth was working for/with Tarpon Bay Partners, LLC, a Toxic lender. Visium Technologies took a loan from Tarpon Bay and when Visium failed to repay the loan, Tarpon Bay filed a involuntary bankruptcy suit against Visium. But there was a problem with Tarpon having 3 damaged petitioners as required by law to file an involuntary bankruptcy petition. Jefferey and Josheph Canouse each claimed to be one of the 3 needed partitioners. Problem is they could not show cause and they knew it. In other words, they tried to con the courts. The case was dismissed.

Moreover, if it turns out – as Visium has argued here – that one or more of the Petitioning Creditors did not hold valid "claims" against Visium under applicable law, then by definition they could not be "creditors" and therefore could not be "petitioning creditors." Indeed, Visium has argued that Carey's and Anvil's claims were gerrymandered to create three petitioning creditors. If Visium is correct that the purported assignments of some portion of Tarpon Bay's claim to Carey and Anvil were invalid, then neither Carey nor Anvil would hold claims against Visium. But, having (allegedly) wrongfully participated in the gerrymandering of Tarpon Bay's claims in an attempt to create three petitioning creditors, the Petitioning Creditors should not be able to escape liability under section 303(i) if their claims prove to be invalid. Thus, by using the term "petitioners," instead of "petitioning creditors," Congress ensured that entities could not escape liability under section 303(i) upon a determination that their claims were invalid.



Then Visium turned around and sued Tarpon Bay and those involved in the scam involuntary case. It looks like that case was also dismissed after they came to a settlement agreement.

https://casetext.com/case/visium-techs-inc-v-tarpon-bay-partners-llc-in-re-visium-techs-inc

https://www.pacermonitor.com/public/case/39467238/Visium_Technologies,_Inc_v_Tarpon_Bay_Partners,_LLC_et_al




Paul Strickland, known scumbag diluter




..


.

I expose stock scams to gain knowledge about investigating the stock market players and for the entertainment it invariably generates. I've received NO compensation in any form for such, except for a few thank yous...